In parts 1-3 of my study on the timing of the
snatching away of the body of Christ,
I argued for the position that the “coming indignation” of God that will
initially characterize the “day of the Lord” (as referred to by Paul in 1 &
2 Thessalonians) will commence no later than 3½ years before Christ’s
eon-concluding return to earth (which I argued will take place
immediately after the completion of the 70th heptad
or “seven” prophesied in Daniel 9). At the time I posted the first three parts of this study, I was open
to the possibility that the day of the Lord and its accompanying indignation
might begin earlier than the timeframe for which I argued. However, certain
considerations made me hesitant at the time to affirm that the snatching
away had to occur before the start of the 70th heptad
(even though I strongly suspected that it would). In this follow-up article, I
will be arguing for the position that the coming indignation of the day of the
Lord will most likely begin at the start of the 70th heptad.
If this position is sound, then it means that the latest that
the body of Christ could be removed from the earth is just prior to the start
of the 70th heptad (which means the snatching away must happen at
least 3½ years earlier than I suggested in my original articles on this subject).
Further Remarks on the Timing and
Duration of the “Great Affliction”
Before I launch into my defense of this
view, I want to address the subject of the timing and duration of the “great
affliction” referred to by Christ in Matthew 24:21. This section can be
considered as both a supplement to my remarks on this subject in the earlier
parts of my study, as well as a defense of the position for which I’ll be
arguing in this article against other competing views concerning the timing of
the snatching away (such as the so-called “pre-wrath” view, as well as the more
traditional and mainstream “post-tribulation” position).
In
Matthew 24:15-22, Christ declared the following to his disciples concerning a
yet-future period of time:
15 “Whenever, then, you may be perceiving the
abomination of desolation, which is declared through Daniel the prophet,
standing in the holy place (let him who is reading apprehend!);
16 then let those in Judea flee into the mountains.
17 Let him who is on the housetop not descend to take away the things out of his house.
18 And let him who is in the field not turn back behind him to pick up his cloak.
19 "Now woe to those who are pregnant and those suckling in those days!
20 Now be praying that your flight may not be occurring in winter, nor yet on a sabbath,
21 for then shall be great affliction, such as has not occurred from the beginning of the world till now; neither under any circumstances may be occurring.
22 And, except those days were discounted, no flesh at all would be saved. Yet, because of the chosen, those days shall be discounted.”
16 then let those in Judea flee into the mountains.
17 Let him who is on the housetop not descend to take away the things out of his house.
18 And let him who is in the field not turn back behind him to pick up his cloak.
19 "Now woe to those who are pregnant and those suckling in those days!
20 Now be praying that your flight may not be occurring in winter, nor yet on a sabbath,
21 for then shall be great affliction, such as has not occurred from the beginning of the world till now; neither under any circumstances may be occurring.
22 And, except those days were discounted, no flesh at all would be saved. Yet, because of the chosen, those days shall be discounted.”
This same
period of time is, I believe, also in view in Luke 21:20-24:
20 “Now whenever you may be perceiving Jerusalem
surrounded by encampments, then know that her desolation is near.
21 Then let those in Judea flee into the mountains, and let those in her midst be coming out into the country, and let not those in the country be entering into her,
22 for days of vengeance are these, to fulfill all that is written.
23 Yet woe to those who are pregnant, and to those suckling in those days; for there will be great necessity in the land and indignation on this people.
24 “And they shall be falling by the edge of the sword and shall be led into captivity into all nations. And Jerusalem shall be trodden by the nations, until the eras of the nations may be fulfilled.”
21 Then let those in Judea flee into the mountains, and let those in her midst be coming out into the country, and let not those in the country be entering into her,
22 for days of vengeance are these, to fulfill all that is written.
23 Yet woe to those who are pregnant, and to those suckling in those days; for there will be great necessity in the land and indignation on this people.
24 “And they shall be falling by the edge of the sword and shall be led into captivity into all nations. And Jerusalem shall be trodden by the nations, until the eras of the nations may be fulfilled.”
The word
translated “eras” in v. 24 is kairoi,
which is the plural form of the word kairos’
(“seasons,” or “appointed times”). We know from Rev. 11:2 that the “eras” or
“seasons” during which Jerusalem will be trodden by the nations will constitute
a period of 3 ½ years (i.e., forty-two months, or 1,260 days). This same period
of time is also in view in Rev. 12:6, where it’s said to be the number of days
that the “woman” (i.e., Israel) will be nourished in the wilderness after
fleeing from life-threatening (and satanically-inspired) persecution. In Rev.
12:14 this same period of time is referred to as “a season, and seasons, and half a season”
(with the words translated “season” and “seasons” being kairos’ and kairoi,
respectively), and likewise refers to a period of time lasting 3 ½ years. We
also know that this will be the exact period of time during which the man of
lawlessness (or “wild beast”) will have authority to “do what [he] wills,”
which will involve blaspheming God as well as violently persecuting and
“conquering” the saints (Rev. 13:5-7).
This same
period of time is referred to in Daniel 7:25, where we’re told that the wicked
ruler of the final world kingdom - the man of lawlessness or “wild beast” – “shall speak words against the Most High, and shall wear out
the saints of the Most High…and they shall be given into his hand for a season and two seasons and half a
season.” This period of time is again referred to in Daniel 12:7 as “an appointed time,
two appointed times and half an appointed time,” and is said to end “when the shattering of the hand
of the holy people is concluded.” The “shattering of the hand of the holy people” is
another reference to the saints being persecuted and “conquered” by the “wild
beast” during this time period.
Significantly,
this last reference in Daniel to the final 3 ½ years of this eon is part of a
response to a question asked by a celestial messenger. In v. 6 the messenger
asks, “How long until the end of these astonishing
things?” The Concordant Version
reads, “Until when is the end of the marvels?”
The word translated “astonishing things” or “marvels” in this verse is the
Hebrew word pele', and appears only here in the
book of Daniel. However, it’s derived from the Hebrew word pala', which
is found in Daniel twice. Significantly, both occurrences of the word pala’ refer to actions involving the
“wild beast” or “man of lawlessness” (who, in Daniel 11:36, is referred to as
“the king who does as is acceptable to himself”). In Daniel 8:24 the word is
used to describe the “marvelous” or “astonishing” way in which the man of
lawlessness will “ruin and prosper and deal” during his reign, and in Daniel
11:36 the word is used to describe the “marvelous” or “astonishing” blasphemies
that the man of lawlessness will be speaking against God during this time.
Thus, the
“astonishing things” or “marvels” referred to in the celestial messenger’s
question in Daniel 12:6 are not to be understood as positive in nature (and most likely would not have been understood
by Daniel as such). Rather, they have to do with events involving the man of
lawlessness and the persecution of the saints under his reign during the second
half of the 70th heptad (which in Daniel 12:1 is referred to as “an era of distress which will come to pass
such as has not occurred since there was a nation on the earth, until that era”).
The
solemn manner in which the celestial messenger answered the question posed in
v. 6 is also significant: he raised both his hands toward the heavens and “swore by Him Who is living for the eon.” As Albert
Barnes remarks in his commentary on this verse, it is “as if the messenger were appealing to heaven for the sincerity and truth of what he was about
to utter.” Thus, we have the solemn oath of one of God’s holy messengers that
the time during which the man of lawlessness will persecute and “wear out” the
saints of the Most High (i.e., the time period that Christ said would be
characterized by “great affliction”) will be 3 ½ years in length.
From this we can conclude that any position which
holds that the time of great affliction will be anything less than 3 ½ years in duration is necessarily mistaken.[1] This also means that when our Lord declared that “except those days were discounted, no flesh at all would be
saved” (Matt. 24:22; cf. Mark 13:20), he simply meant that this time of
great affliction would result in all life being destroyed IF it were to extend beyond the appointed limit that God, in his
mercy, has already set. But because this time of great affliction will be
exactly 3 ½ years in length (or “an appointed time, two appointed times
and half an appointed time”), the hypothetical scenario
that Christ referred to will not actually happen. The “great affliction” will cease
when the appointed times, or seasons, have reached their conclusion.
What about
the Celestial Events of Matthew 24:29?
Before
moving on, I want to address an objection that could be raised at this point by
those holding to the “pre-wrath” position (which seems to have gained in
popularity among evangelical Christians within the past few years or so).
According to the pre-wrath position, the “great affliction” referred to in
Matthew 24:21 will continue for only a part
of the last half of the 70th heptad (rather than continuing until
the end of the 3 ½ years). According to this view, it is only after the time of great affliction ends
that the “wrath of God” will begin (which is understood as involving only the
trumpet and bowl-related judgments).
Proponents
of the pre-wrath position view the celestial events that Christ said would take
place immediately after the great affliction (Matthew 24:29; cf. Mark 13:24-25)
and the celestial events which are associated with the opening of the sixth
seal (Rev. 6:12-17) as being not just similar in nature, but identical. Thus,
according to the pre-wrath view, we should understand these two passages as
referring to the same event and the same point in time. However, assuming that
the events associated with the seals, trumpets and bowls are chronologically
sequential (as I believe to be the case), this creates a problem. It would mean
that the time of great affliction couldn’t possibly last for the entire second
half of the 70th heptad. It would have to end early enough to allow
enough time for the trumpet and bowl-related judgments to occur (which we know
will take longer than five months to complete, as this will be the duration of
the judgment associated with the fifth trumpet alone).
Based on
what scripture clearly reveals concerning the duration of the time of great
affliction, I think the pre-wrath position is simply in error on this point.
For example, verses such as Daniel 7:25 and 12:5-7 (among others considered
earlier) directly contradict the chronological sequence of events proposed by
proponents of the pre-wrath position. The scriptural evidence against this
position notwithstanding, I do think the objection involving the time of the
celestial event of Matthew 24:29 needs to be answered, if for no other reason
than to demonstrate that this verse is perfectly consistent with a sequential
understanding of the seals, trumpets and bowls of Revelation, as well as with
the view that the great affliction will be exactly 3 ½ years long.
With
regards to the view that the seals, trumpets and bowls referred to in Revelation
are sequential (or consecutive-progressive), I am in full agreement with
proponents of the pre-wrath view. A sequential interpretation of these events
seems to be in accord with the most natural and straight-forward reading of the
text. For example, the opening of the seventh seal (which opens the entire
scroll) seems to prepare for, and introduce, the seven trumpets that follow:
“And when It opens
the seventh seal, a hush occurred in heaven as it were half an hour. And I
perceived the seven messengers who stand before God, and seven trumpets were
given to them” (Rev. 8:1-2).
Also, the
silence in heaven referred to in v. 1 seems to provide a contrast with “the thunders and voices and lightnings and
an earthquake” referred
to in v. 5 (which are the result of the golden thurible referred to in v. 3 being cast into the
earth). And just as the opening of the seventh seal appears to lead to the trumpet-related
calamities that follow, so the “third woe” connected with the sounding of the
seventh trumpet can be understood as encompassing the last seven calamities
associated with the “seven bowls of the fury of God” (Rev. 11:14-19; cf.
Rev.15-16).
The
following, then, seems to be the most reasonable view concerning the chronological sequence of
events found in Revelation: (1) the seven seals are opened; (2) the seven trumpets are sounded; (3)
the seven bowls are poured out. And we know that, after the sixth bowl is
poured out, preparation is made for “the battle of the great God Almighty” (or
the “battle of Armageddon”), when “the kings of the whole inhabited earth” are
mobilized to do battle with Christ (Rev. 16:12-16; cf. Rev. 19:19). Since we
know that Christ is to return to earth immediately after the 70th
heptad ends, it follows that the events associated with the pouring out of the
sixth bowl take place shortly before the end of the 70th heptad
(with the pouring out of the seventh bowl possibly being the climactic event
with which this period ends).
More
could be said in defense of this chronologically sequential interpretation of
the seal, trumpet and bowl calamities, but for the sake of brevity (and because
the pre-wrath position doesn’t dispute it) I will simply continue from the
assumption that this understanding is correct. But why is this view of the sequence of events important? The
reason is this: Joel 3:15 describes a celestial event involving the sun, moon
and stars that seems very similar to the event referred to by Christ in Matthew
24:29, but which (based on the context in which the verse is found) appears to
be an event which will be occurring after
the events that are related to the pouring out of the sixth bowl (as described
in Rev. 16:12-16).
Since the
context in which this celestial event is referred to is key to establishing the
time at which it will occur, I’ll be quoting the majority of Joel 3. In verses 1-16
we read the following:
“For behold, in those
days and at that time, when I restore the fortunes of Judah and Jerusalem, I will gather
all the nations and bring them down to the Valley of Jehoshaphat. And I
will enter into judgment with them there, on behalf of my people and my
heritage Israel, because they have scattered them among the nations and have
divided up my land, and have cast
lots for my people, and have traded a boy for a prostitute, and have sold a
girl for wine and have drunk it.
“What are you to me, O Tyre and Sidon, and all the
regions of Philistia? Are you paying me back for something? If you are paying
me back, I will return your payment on your own head swiftly and speedily. For you have taken my silver and my gold, and have carried my
rich treasures into your temples. You
have sold the people of Judah and Jerusalem to the Greeks in order to
remove them far from their own border. Behold, I will stir them up from the place
to which you have sold them, and I will return your payment on your own
head. I will sell your sons and your daughters
into the hand of the people of Judah, and they will sell them to
the Sabeans, to a nation far away, for the Lord has spoken.
“Proclaim this among the nations: Consecrate for war;
stir up the mighty men. Let all the men of war draw near; let them come up. Beat your plowshares into swords,
and your pruning hooks into spears; let the weak say, “I am a warrior.” Hasten and come, all you surrounding
nations, and gather yourselves there. Bring down your warriors, O Lord. Let
the nations stir themselves up and come up to the Valley of Jehoshaphat;
for there I will sit to judge all the surrounding nations. Put in the sickle, for the harvest
is ripe. Go in, tread, for the winepress is full. The vats overflow, for their
evil is great.
“Multitudes, multitudes, in the valley of decision!
For the day of the Lord is near in the valley of
decision. The sun and the moon are darkened,
and the stars withdraw their shining. The Lord roars from Zion,
and utters his voice from Jerusalem, and the heavens and the earth quake.
But the Lord is a refuge to his people, a stronghold to the
people of Israel.
There are several observations that can be made
concerning this remarkable prophetic passage. First, the judgment upon the
nations that will take place at this time is said to be “because they have scattered
them [i.e., God’s people, Israel] among the
nations.” This
judgment, then, will (at least in part) be God’s response to the events
described as taking place in Luke 21:24 (which will begin shortly after the
abomination of desolation has been set up): “And they [the Jewish people] shall be falling by the edge of the sword and shall be led into captivity into all
nations. And Jerusalem shall be trodden by the nations, until the eras of
the nations may be fulfilled.” It is “the nations” into which God’s people will be led into
captivity (and which will be “treading” Jerusalem at this time) that God will
be mobilizing for battle and then judging on this day.
Second, the gathering of the “all nations”
referred to will be part of a military campaign. It will involve armies that
will consist of people from every nation, and they’ll be assembled for battle
against what they’ll perceive to be a common enemy and threat[2] (what these “united nations” won’t realize at
this time is that God will have gathered them there for judgment, and that the
battle for which they’ve prepared themselves is going to be entirely
one-sided). The battle for which the nations in this passage are described as
preparing for is, I submit, none other than “the battle of the great day of God
Almighty,” as referred to in Rev. 16:12-16:
“And the sixth
pours out his bowl on the great river Euphrates. And its water is dried up that
the road of the kings from the orient may be made ready. And I perceived, out
of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the wild beast, and out of
the mouth of the false prophet, three unclean spirits, as if frogs (for they
are spirits of demons, doing signs), which
are going out to the kings of the whole inhabited earth, to be mobilizing them
for the battle of the great day of God Almighty. ("Lo! I am coming as
a thief! Happy is he who is watching and keeping his garments, that he may not
be walking naked and they may be observing his indecency!") And they mobilized them at the place
called, in Hebrew, "Armageddon."
Later we
read that John “perceived the wild beast and the kings
of the earth and their armies, gathered to do battle with Him Who is sitting on
the horse and with His army” (Rev. 19:19). We can therefore infer from
these verses that the “nations”
which will be gathered for the war referred to in Joel 3:9 will constitute the
armies of “the
kings of the whole inhabited earth” (we can also infer that these will be the
same “all nations” into which Israel will be led captive).[3]
Third, it is after the nations have been mobilized and gathered for battle in
the “valley of decision” that the celestial event referred to in Joel 3 will be
taking place. Consider, again, verses 14-15: “Multitudes,
multitudes, in the valley of decision! For the day of the Lord is near in the valley of
decision. The sun and the moon are darkened, and the stars withdraw
their shining.” Thus,
the chronological sequence of Joel’s prophecy is as follows: (1) “All the
nations” gather in the “valley of Jehoshaphat” (or “valley of decision”),
prepared for battle; (2) After they’ve been gathered to this location, we’re
told that the “day of Yahweh” is “near,” and the celestial event referred to in
v. 15 takes place; [4] (3) God judges the nations gathered at this
time, and begins to “restore the fortunes
of Judah and Jerusalem.”
Since we know that the nations will not begin
to mobilize for battle until after
the sixth bowl is poured out, we can conclude that the celestial event
described in v. 15 will take place sometime after the sixth bowl. Thus, we can
conclude that the celestial event referred to in Joel 3:15 will be taking place
after the sixth bowl calamity has already taken place. It cannot, therefore, be
identified with the celestial event related to the opening of the sixth seal
(which will be chronologically prior to the judgments associated with both the
bowls and the trumpets). This being the case, we can conclude that the
celestial event related to the opening of the sixth seal will not be the only celestial event of this
nature taking place before Christ returns to earth. But if that’s the case,
then we need not identify the celestial event described in Matthew 24:29 with
the event described in Rev. 6:12-13 (which means that the objection raised by
the pre-wrath proponent loses any force that it may have otherwise had).
That there will be at least two celestial events of
a similar nature occurring before Christ’s return shouldn’t be all that surprising,
since we know from Revelation that there will be several events taking place
during the course of the day of the Lord that will, in some way, involve the
heavenly bodies. For example, Rev. 8:12 describes an event involving the light
of the sun, the moon and the stars being diminished; Rev. 9:1-2 describes an
event that will involve the sun’s being darkened by smoke; Rev. 16:8 describes
an event involving people being scorched with great heat from the sun; and Rev.
16:10 seems to imply that the sun (and perhaps the moon and stars as well) will
be completely darkened for a time.
There’s also no reason why God wouldn’t (or
shouldn’t) do the same thing more than once, or do a similar thing on two
different occasions during the day of the Lord.[5]
Since we know that the celestial event related to the sixth seal will be
occurring at least twelve calamities earlier
than the celestial event described in Matthew 24:29, it’s possible that the
connection between these two celestial events is this: both celestial events
will be occurring “immediately after” a certain appointed time has passed, with
the first celestial event marking the end of the first half of the 70th heptad and the second event
marking the end of the second half
(this is, of course, purely speculative on my part, but it would at least be
consistent with what we know concerning the chronology of the events foretold
in Revelation).
To
summarize the position advanced in this section, the time period that Christ
said would involve “great affliction” will be exactly 3 ½ years long, and the
celestial events referred to in Matthew 24:29 will be occurring “immediately after
the affliction of those days.” That is, the “days” that Christ had in
view (and after which the celestial signs will “immediately” occur) will be
exactly 1,260 in number – i.e., the second half of the 70th heptad.
And since, according to the chronology of Revelation, the sixth seal involves
events that will take place during
the 70th heptad (before both the trumpet-related calamities and the
bowl-related calamities take place), and the events described in Matthew 24:29
will be occurring immediately after
the 70th heptad has ended, it follows that the celestial events
described in these two passages are distinct, and will occur at two different
times.
The Olivet Discourse and the Day of the Lord
There
are several observations that I believe lend support to the view that God’s
day-of-the-Lord indignation will begin at, or near, the start of the 70th
heptad (rather than midway through it). I’ll begin my defense of this position
by first considering Christ’s “Olivet Discourse,” as found in the synoptic
gospel accounts (Matthew 24-25, Mark 13 and Luke 21).
The
consistently ordered content found in each account of Christ’s discourse
suggests a general chronological sequence of events that will occur during the
final years leading up to Christ’s return to earth at the conclusion of this
eon. Christ seems to have provided his disciples with a general outline of
events that will be taking place during a certain period of time that will have
a beginning, a midpoint and a conclusion. And not only this, but Christ seemed
to describe this future period of time in such a way that it can be divided up
into two halves.
The
first half of this future period of time will, it seems, be characterized by
events that Christ referred to as “the beginning of pangs” (Matt. 24:8). In
Matthew 24:4-8, we read:
3 Now at His sitting on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to
Him privately, saying, "Tell us, when will these things be? And what is
the sign of Thy presence and of the conclusion of the eon?"
4 And, answering, Jesus said to them, "Beware that no one
should be deceiving you.
5 For many shall be coming in My name, saying, 'I am the Christ!'
and shall be deceiving many.
6 Yet you shall be about to be hearing battles, and tidings of
battles. See that you are not alarmed, for it must be occurring; but not as yet
is the consummation.
7 For roused shall be a
nation against a nation, and a kingdom against a kingdom, and there shall be
famines and quakes in places.
8 Yet all these are the
beginning of pangs.
Luke’s
account of Christ’s description of the “beginning of pangs” is as follows: “Roused shall be
nation against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. Besides, there shall be
great quakes and, in places, famines and pestilences. There shall be fearful
sights besides great signs also from heaven.”
In
contrast with this earlier period (in which “pangs” will be “beginning”), the
second half of the time period that Christ had in view will be characterized by
what Christ called “great affliction” (Matt. 24:19-21), which will involve
“affliction such as has not occurred from the beginning of the creation which
God creates till now, and under no circumstances may be occurring” (Mark
13:19-20). Moreover, we know that it is the second
half of the prophesied 70th heptad that will be a time of “great
affliction,” since this affliction begins shortly after the “abomination of
desolation” has been set up in the temple by the man of lawlessness and false
prophet (Dan. 9:27; Matt. 24:15; 2 Thess. 2:4; Rev. 13:4-17).
We
also know that this time of great affliction will involve “indignation” being
upon the Jewish people (Luke 21:23; cf. Jer. 30:4-7). Shortly after the
abomination of desolation has been set up in the future temple, it will be
necessary for Israelites living in Judea to flee into the mountains in order to
avoid being killed or led into captivity into all nations (Luke 21:24; cf.
Zech. 14:1-2). We’re told that these will be “days of vengeance” in which there
will be “great necessity in the land and indignation on this people.”
What
Christ referred to as “indignation on this people” is not something that will
involve only a relatively small number of believing Israelites who will be
undergoing persecution while an unbelieving Jewish majority is spared. Rather,
it will involve what seems to be a genocidal attempt (on the part of certain
gentiles) to rid the land - and possible all of the earth - of the Jewish
people. At this time, two thirds of all the Israelites in Judea will “be cut
off and perish,” with only one third being left alive (Zech. 13:1, 8-9). And
the spared remnant will clearly consist of believers with whom God will be in a
newly-established covenantal relationship (as is evident from the final part of
Zech. 13:9).
Thus,
from the midpoint of the 70th heptad on, the Jewish people in
general - beginning with those living in the land of Judea - will be severely
persecuted by the nations, and this persecution will most likely be
directly instigated and authorized by the man of lawlessness and the false
prophet. In contrast with this more general affliction of the Jewish people
during the second half of the 70th heptad is the affliction that
Christ prophesied would more specifically target a believing minority during
the period that will involve “the beginning of pangs.” Immediately after
referring to the “beginning of pangs,” Christ declared the following to his
disciples in vv. 9-10: ”Then shall they be giving you
up to affliction, and they shall be killing you, and you shall be hated by all
of the nations because of My name. And then many shall be snared, and they
shall be giving one another up and hating one another.”
The
fact that Christ used the same word translated “affliction” in both v. 9 and v.
21 - but added the word “great” in v. 21 (making it “great affliction”) -
strongly suggests that he was referring to two different periods that would
both involve affliction (with the latter time of affliction being worse than the time he had in view in
verses 9-10). But what about the word “then” in verse 9? Does it mean “after that”
or “during that time?” Since the Greek word τότε can have either meaning,
let’s compare these verses with Luke’s account of Christ’s discourse to see if
we can determine what Christ meant. In Luke 21:10-16 we read:
“Then He said to them, ‘Roused shall be nation against nation, and
kingdom against kingdom. Besides, there shall be great quakes and, in places,
famines and pestilences. There shall be fearful sights besides great signs also
from heaven.
“Yet before all these things they shall be laying
their hands on you and they shall be persecuting you, giving you up into the
synagogues and jails, being led off to kings and governors on account of My
name. Yet it shall be eventuating to you for a testimony. Ponder, then, in your
hearts not to be premeditating a defense, for I will be giving you a mouth and
wisdom, which all those opposing you shall not be able to withstand or
contradict. Yet you shall be given up by parents also, and brothers and
relatives and friends, and they shall be putting some of you to death.'”
Since,
in v. 12, we read that the persecution of the saints of this future era will be
(or will begin) “before all these
things,” it can be reasonably inferred that the word “then” in Matthew 24:9
should be understood as meaning “during that time” (i.e., just before the events
described in Matthew 24:7 and Luke 21:10-11). In other words, sometime before nation shall be roused against
nation and kingdom against kingdom, some (perhaps all) believers in Christ –
i.e., those who’ll be believing “the evangel of the kingdom” (or “evangel of
the circumcision”) at this time - will begin to be “hated by all because of
[Christ’s] name,” and consequently will begin to be persecuted.
Thus,
based on the chronology provided in Luke’s account, we should understand the
time when persecution breaks out against the saints to be at the time when many will begin to be deceived by false christs,
and when believers will be “about to be
hearing battles, and tidings of battles.” This, again, will be immediately before the time referred to in Luke
21:10-11 and Matthew 24:7-8.
Here,
then, is what I take to be the most accurate chronology of events, based on a
harmonization of the synoptic gospel accounts:
1.
Believers in Christ, specifically, will begin to be afflicted, and this
affliction will involve their being killed, hated by “all the nations,” given
up into the synagogues and jails, being led off to kings and governors on
account of Christ’s name, being given up (and even put to death) by parents,
brothers, relatives and friends.
2.
Many false christs will arise and be deceiving many, and the saints “shall be
about to be hearing battles, and tidings of battles.”
3. “Nation
will be roused against nation and kingdom against kingdom, there shall be
famines, quakes and pestilences in places, along with fearful sights besides
great signs also from heaven.”
4.
Jerusalem will be “surrounded by encampments” and “the abomination of
desolation” will be “standing in the holy place” (which will be the sign that
Jerusalem’s “desolation is near,” and that those Israelites living in Judea
must flee into the mountains in order to escape what’s about to happen).
5.
The time of “great affliction” will begin, and Jerusalem shall begin to “be
trodden by the nations, until the eras of the nations may be fulfilled” (which,
we discover from Rev. 11:2, will last forty-two months – i.e., the second half
of the 70th heptad).
The
fact that at least some of the persecuted saints that Christ had in view would
be “given up into the synagogues” not only implies that the persecuted saints
in view will be Jewish, but it also implies that their unbelieving persecutors
will be Jewish as well. This is also implied by the fact that some Jewish
believers will be given up by (and even killed by) parents, brothers, relatives
and friends. This persecution of believing Jews by unbelieving Jews suggests
that the “great affliction” which will characterize the second half of the 70th
heptad will not yet have begun. How so?
As
argued earlier, it will be the Jewish people in general who, at this point,
will come to be under affliction, and not just a believing Jewish minority. But
what might account for this change in the category of people who will be
“targeted” for persecution during the 70th heptad? Why will the
later period involve a Jewish majority being persecuted by unbelieving gentiles
(under the direction of the man of lawlessness), whereas the earlier period
will involve a Jewish minority being persecuted by unbelieving gentiles and unbelieving Jews? This may very well
be due to the fact that, by this point in the 70th heptad (which
will be around the midpoint of the “week”), the majority of Israelites will
have become “un-calloused,” and come to believe the evangel of the kingdom
being heralded at this time. Or, at the very least, it may be because the
majority of Israelites will, at this time, have become opposed to the man of
lawlessness (even if they remain unbelievers with regards to the evangel).
Part Five: http://thathappyexpectation.blogspot.com/2017/09/a-study-on-timing-of-snatching-away_18.html
[1] For example, those who
hold to the “pre-wrath” position on the timing of the snatching away hold that
the time of great affliction could end one to two years before the 70th heptad ends (see, for example, the following
chart, which was created by one of the leading proponents of this position: http://www.alankurschner.com/2013/01/22/feel-free-to-use-this-prewrath-timeline-overview-chart-for-your-purposes/).
[2]
Insofar
as this is the case, the
judgment described in Joel 3 should not, I don’t think, be identified with the
judgment referred to by Christ in Matthew 25:31-46. The judgment referred to in
Matt. 25 does not take place on a battlefield, or in the context of a military
campaign. It will not involve people from every nation gathering in preparation
for war. Rather, the judgment of Matt. 25 will be more formal in nature, taking
place in Jerusalem after Christ has already been enthroned, and after all
military forces hostile to his rule have already been neutralized.
[3] It may be
objected that, in Joel 3:2, 12, the location of the battle is said to be “the
valley of Jehoshaphat,” while in Rev. 16:16 it’s said to be “Armageddon.”
However, it’s possible (and I think likely) that these are simply two different
ways of referring to the same place. Although there is a tradition (dating from
around the fourth century AD on) which equates the valley of Jehoshaphat with
the Kidron Valley, this is simply one of several views on what location,
exactly, Joel 3 is referring to. The Christian historian Eusebius, for example, identified this valley with
the Valley of Hinnom (i.e., “Gehenna”). Others have suggested the
Valley of Beracah, where King
Jehoshaphat overthrew the enemies of Israel (2 Chr. 20:26).
However, given the fact that
Jehoshaphat simply means “Yahweh shall judge,” it’s more likely that “valley of
Jehoshaphat” is simply a figurative way of referring to the area in which
judgment will occur, in accordance with Joel’s prophecy. In this sense, it’s no
more the literal name of a valley
than the expression, “valley of decision” in Joel 3:14. According to this view,
the expression “valley of Jehoshaphat” (or “valley of decision”) could easily
be applied to the Valley of Jezreel (also known as the plain of Esdraelon), which
is an immense plain surrounded by hills and mountains. One of the hills that
borders this plain (and from which one can overlook it) is the hill of Megiddo
(“Armageddon” can be understood to mean either “Mount Megiddo” or “hill of
Megiddo,” as the Hebrew word “har” can refer to either a mountain or a range of
hills). For more information on this subject, see the article at the following
link: http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2014/11/05/Megiddo-The-Place-of-Battles.aspx#Article. See also the following map: http://www.bible-history.com/geography/ancient-israel/plain-of-esdraelon-megiddo.html
[4]
As argued in part two of my original study, I
believe the expression “day of the Lord” is used in both a “broad” and a
“narrow” sense in scripture, and thus does not always refer to the same exact
time period. According to the broad sense in which this and similar expressions
are used, the day of the Lord refers to both the coming time of indignation
(which, in this article, I’ll be arguing encompasses the entirety of the 70th
heptad) as well as the entirety of the fourth eon (which embraces the entire
millennial reign of Christ). According to the “narrow” sense, the expression
refers only to the day of Christ’s return (i.e., the literal day which
concludes this present wicked eon and ushers in the next). In Joel 3:14 (cf.
2:31), I believe the expression “day of the Lord” is being used in the “narrow”
sense, and refers to the day of Christ’s return.
[5]
There’s
also reason to believe that there may be a slight difference between the
celestial events related to the opening of the sixth seal and those that will
take place immediately after the time of great affliction. It’s interesting to
note that the celestial event related to the opening of the sixth seal will
involve the moon becoming “as blood,” whereas the celestial event described in
Matthew 24:29 is said to involve the moon “not giving her beams.” Might this
mean that the moon will be giving off a blood-red light during the sixth
seal-related event, and no light on the day that Christ returns? The wording used
by Christ is at least consistent with this view.
It’s also
worth noting that, in addition to referring to the celestial event that will
occur on the day of Christ’s return to earth (at which point the sun and moon
will both be “darkened”), the prophet Joel also
referred specifically to a celestial event that will involve the sun’s being
“converted into darkness” and “the moon into blood” (Joel 2:30-31; cf. Acts
2:19-20).
Part 4 =>
ReplyDeleteYou wrote: “This being the case, we can conclude that the celestial event related to the opening of the sixth seal will not be the only celestial event of this nature taking place before Christ returns to earth. But if that’s the case, then we need not identify the celestial event described in Matthew 24:29 with the event described in Rev. 6:12-13 (which means that the objection raised by the pre-wrath proponent loses any force that it may have otherwise had).”
Except when the event described in Matt 24:29 is the same as in Zech 14:3-5 where His feet will stand on the mount of Olives and there will be a flight through the ravine created by the split.
This event looks the same as Rev 12:14-16.
And the event in Rev 19 is a different one where Jesus will appear to deal the final blow to the nations’ armies.
Part 4 - note [2] =>
Apostasia is a general word denoting “a removal from…”. It can, e.g., mean “removal from a faith” or “removal from a physical place” (e.g., the earth)!
If it is only translated by “apostasy”, then some “colored bias” seems to be added to it. ��
However, even in this case the meaning should be understood as removal from something (e.g., the faith) that was present in the past!! For the “antichrist”, this was never the case!
If one reads 2Thess 2:3 in THIS (new) light, then it will be clear (in my view) that Paul refers to the snatching away here.
Part 4 =>
Chronology, point 1 =>
What do you think will happen before the great affliction of believers in Jesus?
I think,
- God will remove the blindness from Israel,
- Jewish ecclesias will come into existence, first in Israel, e.g. as the 7 ecclesias of Revelation.
Seems logical, right?
Hi Val Lev,
ReplyDeleteI wrote: “This being the case, we can conclude that the celestial event related to the opening of the sixth seal will not be the only celestial event of this nature taking place before Christ returns to earth. But if that’s the case, then we need not identify the celestial event described in Matthew 24:29 with the event described in Rev. 6:12-13 (which means that the objection raised by the pre-wrath proponent loses any force that it may have otherwise had).”
You wrote: “Except when the event described in Matt 24:29 is the same as in Zech 14:3-5 where His feet will stand on the mount of Olives and there will be a flight through the ravine created by the split.”
Although both Matthew 24:15-21 and Zech. 14:5 describe events involving certain saints fleeing for safety, it seems to me that the sequence of events described in these two passages are chronologically discrepant, and should be understood as referring to two distinct events that will take place at two different times. In Zech. 14:5, the fleeing of the saints in view occurs after Christ has descended to the Mount of Olives, for it is his descent to this mount that causes the “split” to occur (thereby providing the saints an escape route). However, in Matthew 24:15-21, the fleeing occurs just before (or at the start of) the beginning of the time of “great affliction,” and clearly prior to the time when the sign of the Son of Man appears in the sky and Christ is seen by anyone (vv. 29-30). The appearing of Christ at the time referred to in Matthew 24 is “immediately AFTER [not during] the affliction of those days,” and the “affliction” that Christ’s appearing takes place after clearly includes the events referred to in vv. 15-21. So these are two separate events. Consider the following:
Matthew 24:15-30 Sequence of Events
1. The abomination of desolation is set up in the holy place (v. 15).
2. Israelites in Judea who heed the exhortation found in vv. 16-18 flee into the mountains.
3. “Then shall be great affliction, such as has not occurred from the beginning of the world till now…” (vv. 19-22). The duration of this time of “great affliction” is not specified in Matt. 24, but scripture elsewhere informs us that it will be 3 ½ years long.
4. “Immediately AFTER the affliction of those days the sun shall be darkened and the moon shall not be giving her beams, and the stars shall be falling from heaven...” (v. 29)
5. “Then shall appear the sign of the Son of Mankind in heaven…and they shall see the Son of Mankind coming on the clouds of heaven with power and much glory” (v. 30).
Again, the fleeing referred to in Matt. 24:16-18 clearly refers to something that will occur just before, or at the start of, the time of “great affliction,” while the celestial events and coming of Christ on the clouds of heaven occurs “immediately after the affliction of those days.” The affliction of what days? The days that will begin when (or shortly after) certain Israelite in Judea flee into the mountains after the abomination of desolation has been set up. In contrast with this sequence of events, the fleeing referred to in Zech. 14:5 will take place AFTER the feet of Christ have already touched the Mount of Olives, and the mountain has been “split in two from east to west by a very wide valley.” I submit that what’s being described in Zech. 14:5 (which will involve Israelites fleeing to a newly-created valley between two mountains that was once the Mount of Olives after Christ has returned to earth) simply cannot be reconciled with the event referred to in Matthew 24:16-18 (which will involve Israelites fleeing “into the mountains” at the start of a period of “great affliction”).
(Continued)
ReplyDeleteWhile the events of Zech. 14:1-5 do occur sequentially (with the events referred to in verses 3-5 taking place after the events referred to in verses 1-2), I don’t think they follow immediately after these events. As is the case with many prophetic verses in the Hebrew Scriptures, I believe there is an unspecified gap of time in between these verses. Thus, although verses 2 and 3 are chronologically sequential, I believe the events described will be separated by approximately 3 ½ years. Verses 1-2 describe what will be taking place after the midpoint of the 70th heptad (when the time of “great affliction” referred to in Matt 24:21 begins), while verses 3-5 describe God’s intervention on behalf of those who’ve gone through this period of great affliction (which, again, I believe will occur immediately after the 70th heptad ends). According to this view, Zech. 14:1-2 and Matt. 24:15-21 refer to the same period of time, and Zech. 14:3-5 and Matt. 24:29-30 refer to the same period of time, but in between these two events is a period of 3 ½ years.
You wrote: “This event looks the same as Rev 12:14-16.”
Insofar as I don’t believe the fleeing of Israelites described in Zech. 14:5 (which will be to a valley within two mountains) will take place at the same time as the events of Matt. 24:15-21 (which will be “into the mountains”), I don’t believe Zech. 14:5 refers to the same event as that described in Rev. 12:14-16. The former event will occur shortly AFTER the second half of the 70th heptad has ended (“immediately after the affliction of those days”), while the latter described in Rev. 12:14-16 will occur when the “great affliction” has just begun. Moreover, the verses following Zechariah 14:5 do not suggest that those described as fleeing at this time (which, again, will be after Christ has already returned to earth and set foot on the Mount of Olives) will be in need of protection from their enemies for a 3 ½ year period of time, while being “nourished in the wilderness” (as will be the case for Israel during the second half of the 70th heptad); rather, the verses suggest that the kingdom of God will have arrived on the earth by this point, and that “the Lord will be king over all the earth” (Zech. 14:9). No 3 ½ year-long period of protection from enemies and “nourishing” will be required after the fleeing of Zech. 14:5 takes place, because it is at this time that the enemies of Israel are defeated by Christ (Zech. 14:3).
You wrote: “And the event in Rev 19 is a different one where Jesus will appear to deal the final blow to the nations’ armies.”
I’m not convinced that this will be the case, or that Jesus will being dealing a first “blow to the nations’ armies” and then have to deal a more decisive “final blow” to these same armies later. I trust that the “first blow” that Jesus will deal to the nations’ armies will be sufficient, and that this first (and, I believe, final) blow will occur at the event described in Rev. 19 (and, I believe, Zech. 14:3). I don’t believe there will have to be a “round two” after Yahweh goes and “fights against those nations as when he fights on a day of battle!”
Concerning the “apostasia” of 2 Thess. 2:3, my earlier (and tentatively-held) view of the nature of this apostasia (which I gave a brief defense of in the second footnote of part 3 of my study) was not so much that the man of lawlessness would “abandon” a faith that he once had; rather, what I argued for was that the apostasia would involve a public renouncement of his prior publically-expressed belief in God, and in this sense it constituted more of an act of rebellion against God than a change in personal convictions (in support of this understanding of apostasia, I cited some examples in which the word was used to mean “rebellion” in a religious and political sense). However, for several reasons, I have since come to reject this view concerning the “apostasy” that Paul had in view.
ReplyDeleteIt was around the time that I posted the first three parts of my study that I first became aware of the view that you suggest (according to which the apostasia refers to the physical or spatial departure of the body of Christ from the earth). I actually suggested this view in a private correspondence with our brother Philip Garrison, who at the time didn’t find it compelling (and even referred to it in an article he wrote on the subject of the snatching away, expressing his rejection of it). I remained on the fence concerning it for a while, but have in the past few months found myself more persuaded that it is, in fact, the best understanding of what Paul had in mind in 2 Thess. 2:3. And of course, if the snatching away is indeed what Paul had in view here, it really is a game-changer as far as demonstrating (in as succinct a way as possible) the truth that the snatching away will occur before the day of the Lord is present, and before the man of lawlessness is unveiled. Perhaps I’ll write a blog article in defense of this position soon. I’ve even considered writing a rebuttal to an article written by a proponent of the “prewrath” position (Alan Kurschner), in which he attempts to refute this view of the apostasia.
You wrote: “What do you think will happen before the great affliction of believers in Jesus?
ReplyDeleteI think,
- God will remove the blindness from Israel,
- Jewish ecclesias will come into existence, first in Israel, e.g. as the 7 ecclesias of Revelation.
Seems logical, right?”
Yeah, this seems logical. However, with regards to the “blindness” or “callousness” being removed from Israel, I’m not sure whether this is something that will be completed immediately, or something that will begin at some point and continue for a period of time until callousness is completely removed. In any case, I see the removal of callousness from Israel as happening at some point (or for some period of time) during the first half of the 70th heptad.
Aaron
DeleteCan you explain the extra time added to the tribulation? I studied that the first half is 1260 days and the second half is 1290 days. In Chapter 8 of Isaiah, after the previous chapters Isaiah is in the Lords day being shown all the inflictions. Then in Chapter 8 it says these inflictions will come to pass after 6 years, 6 months and 5 days. This timing brings us to the 1235th day in the second Heptad leaving 55 days left. Do you have an explanation or study on this?
Hi Dave,
DeleteCould you provide some more exact scripture references (i.e., chapter and verses) please? Doing so would help me better understand that on which you would like me to comment. I don't see where, in chapter 8 of Isaiah, the duration of the time of "great affliction" is addressed.
Thanks!
Hi Dave, I just realized you probably meant Ezekiel 8, not Isaiah 8. If that's the case, I've never understood this to be a reference to the time of great affliction. The words "in the sixth year, in the sixth month, on the fifth day of the month" (Ez. 8:1) tell us the date on which Ezekiel received his next visions (v. 3). The "sixth year" of which Ezekiel speaks most likely refers to the sixth year of the captivity of Jehoiachin (compare with Eze. 1:2). On the other hand, Daniel chapter 12 does refer to a period of 1290 days (as well as 1335 days), as I note briefly in part one of my study. But I don't think either involves days being added to the time of great affliction. Rather, I think it refers to other events that will be taking place after the time of great affliction has ended (i.e., after Christ has returned to earth).
Delete