Thursday, September 27, 2018

God’s covenant people: Why most believing Jews in Paul’s day weren’t in the body of Christ (Part Two)

Israel’s Covenant-Based Expectation

There is much that could be said concerning the covenant-based expectation of the nation of Israel. However, for the sake of brevity and the purpose of this study, I’ll have to limit my focus to just a few of the many passages of scripture that deal with the subject of Israel’s future allotment during the eons to come.

Concerning Israel’s new covenant, the author of the letter to the Hebrews quoted Jeremiah 31:31-34 as follows:

For if that first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no occasion to look for a second. For he finds fault with them when he says: Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will establish a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt. For they did not continue in my covenant, and so I showed no concern for them, declares the Lord. For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my laws into their minds, and write them on their hearts, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. And they shall not teach, each one his neighbor and each one his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest. For I will be merciful toward their iniquities, and I will remember their sins no more.

Some think that the new covenant promised in Jeremiah 31 is not a literal covenant, but figurative only. Although I don't think much hangs on whether the covenant is literal or figurative, my own view is that the covenant is indeed a literal covenant, and that the alternative view is based on an erroneous understanding of what a “covenant” actually is. Those who think the new covenant can’t be a literal covenant seem to hold to this position because they define a “covenant” as being something that essentially involves two parties that each have certain responsibilities/duties that must be fulfilled in order for the covenant to exist or remain in effect. But this definition of “covenant” is, I think, too narrow, and doesn't take into account some critical scriptural data on the subject of covenant.

A covenant is, I believe, essentially a legally binding arrangement between parties as to a course of action. Although a covenant does essentially involve at least two parties, it does not essentially involve each party having to do certain things in fulfillment of some covenantal obligation. With regards to stipulations, a covenant can be either bilateral or unilateral in nature. In fact, the first covenant referred to in Scripture – the so-called “Noahic covenant” (the sign of which is the rainbow) – was/is clearly unilateral in nature, depending solely on God for its continuance (see Genesis 9:8-17). This one-sided covenant applies to all humanity (as well as to all other living creatures on earth), and involves no stipulations for those with whom God established it. And in this regard, the “new covenant” that God promised to establish with Israel is like the Noahic covenant. Unlike the “old covenant,” it is unilateral in nature.

Now, we know that the mediator of the new covenant between God and the house of Israel/house of Judah is Christ himself (Hebrews 9:15-17), who “confirmed” or “ratified” the covenant by means of his sacrificial death (a fact which we find reaffirmed in Hebrews 7:22, 8:6, 10:29, 12:24 and 13:20). However, the actual realization of the covenant that Christ ratified through his death awaits a future fulfillment, and will take place when “those who are called may be obtaining the promise of the eonian enjoyment of the allotment” (Heb. 9:15). In fact, just three verses before the passage from Jeremiah 31 that the author of Hebrews quotes, we read that the days when this new covenant will be “established” or “concluded” is when God plants Israel back in their land and begins multiplying people and animals there: Behold, the days are coming, averring is Yahweh, when I will sow the house of Israel and the house of Judah with the seed of mankind and the seed of beasts. And it will come to be just as I was alert over them to pluck up and to break down, to demolish and to destroy and to smash, so I shall be alert over them to build and to plant, averring is Yahweh(Jer. 31:27-28).

Compare the above verses from Jeremiah with Ezekiel 36:10-11 and 37:25-26, where God declares the following to the land in which Israel will be dwelling when the new covenant goes into effect: I will increase humanity on you, all the house of Israel, all of it, And the cities will be indwelt, And the deserted places shall be rebuilt. I will increase on you human and beast, And they will be abundant and fruitful; I will make you indwelt as you were formerly, And I will bring more good than in your beginnings. Then you will know that I am Yahweh. I will lead humanity, My people Israel, onto you, And they will tenant you, And you will become their allotment, And you will never again make them bereaved…Thus they will dwell on the land that I gave to My servant Jacob, in which your fathers dwelt; they will dwell on it, they and their sons and their sons’ sons throughout the eon, and David My servant will be their prince for the eon. I will contract with them a covenant of peace; it shall come to be an eonian covenant with them; I will establish them and increase them…”

Paul understood the implementation of the new covenant to be a future event as well. According to what he wrote in Romans 11:25-27, it will not take place until “the complement of the nations” has entered, and “callousness, in part” has been removed from Israel: “For I am not willing for you to be ignorant of this secret, brethren, lest you may be passing for prudent among yourselves, that callousness, in part, on Israel has come, until the complement of the nations may be entering. And thus all Israel shall be saved, according as it is written, Arriving out of Zion shall be the Rescuer. He will be turning away irreverence from Jacob. And this is my covenant with them Whenever I should be eliminating their sins.

When Paul wrote, “according as it is written,” he had in mind the words of Isaiah 59:20-21. Here is the full quotation of the second part quoted by Paul, from Isaiah 59:21: As for Me, this is My covenant with them, says Yahweh: My spirit which is on you And My words which I place in your mouth, They shall not be removed from your mouth, Or from the mouth of your seed, Or from the mouth of your seed’s seed, says Yahweh, Henceforth and for the eon.” Whereas in Jeremiah 31 God promised to put his laws in the minds and write them on the hearts of his covenant people, here he promises that the “words” which he places in their mouth will never be removed from their mouth. That the fulfillment of this promise will take place when Jerusalem becomes the greatest city in the world is evident from what we read in the chapter that immediately follows (see also Isaiah 2:1-4).

In Ezekiel 36:24-31, we read the following: For I will take you from among the nations, and gather you out of all the countries, and will bring you into your own land. I will sprinkle clean water on you, and you shall be clean: from all your filthiness, and from all your idols, will I cleanse you. I will also give you a new heart, and I will put a new spirit within you; and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you a heart of flesh. I will put My Spirit within you, and cause you to walk in My statutes, and you shall keep My ordinances, and do them. You shall dwell in the land that I gave to your fathers; and you shall be My people, and I will be your God. I will save you from all your uncleanness: and I will call for the grain, and will multiply it, and lay no famine on you. I will multiply the fruit of the tree, and the increase of the field, that you may receive no more the reproach of famine among the nations. Then you shall remember your evil ways, and your doings that were not good; and you shall loathe yourselves in your own sight for your iniquities and for your abominations.”

In these verses, we find that, when the new covenant goes into effect, Israel will be gathered by God into the land that God promised to the fathers.

The kingdom restored to Israel

In the next chapter of Ezekiel we find that the land promised to Israel will constitute the geographical territory of the kingdom that is to be restored to Israel. We also find that God’s servant, David, will reign as king over the restored nation (which means that David will be among the saints of Israel who are to be resurrected seventy-five days after Christ’s return to earth):

Thus says my Lord Yahweh:  Behold, I shall take the sons of Israel from among the nations where they have gone, and I will convene them from all around and bring them to their own ground. I will make them one nation in the land, on the mountains of Israel, and one king shall be king for them all. They shall no longer be two nations, nor shall they be divided into two kingdoms any longer. They shall not defile themselves any longer with their idol clods, with their abominations and with all their transgressions. I will save them from all their backslidings in which they have sinned and will cleanse them. They will become My people, and I Myself shall become their Elohim.

My servant David will be king over them, and there shall come to be one shepherd for them all. They shall walk in My ordinances and observe My statutes, and they will do them. Thus they will dwell on the land that I gave to My servant Jacob, in which your fathers dwelt; they will dwell on it, they and their sons and their sons’ sons throughout the eon, and David My servant will be their prince for the eon. I will contract with them a covenant of peace; It shall come to be an eonian covenant with them; I will establish them and increase them; I will put My sanctuary in their midst for the eon, And My tabernacle will be over them. Thus I will become their Elohim, And they shall become My people. Then the nations will know that I, Yahweh, am hallowing Israel When My sanctuary comes to be in their midst for the eon.

The land to which Israel will be gathered by God when the new covenant goes into effect will be the location of the “kingdom of God” or “kingdom of the heavens” of which Christ so often spoke during his earthly ministry. Some have mistakenly understood the words “of the heavens” to mean that the kingdom of which Christ spoke will be in the heavens. However, nowhere in the Hebrew Scriptures is heaven ever said to be the future home of God’s covenant people, Israel. It is on the earth - not in the heavens - that believing Israelites expected to live and reign during the reign of the Messiah (Jer. 31:1-40; Isa. 61:1-62: 12; Isa. 65:17-24; Ezek. 36:24-38; Mic.2:12-13; Zech. 14:8-20). We further read that the reign of the Messiah and of the faithful within Israel (e.g., David) will be characterized by peace and harmony on the earth (Isa. 2:1-4; 11:6-9; 14:3-7; Isa. 35:6-7, 32:15, 35:1; Isa. 51:3; Isa. 65:25; Amos 9:13).

The expression “kingdom of the heavens” does not inform us of the location of the kingdom about which Christ taught during his earthly ministry; rather, the words “of the heavens” are a reference to the source and character of this kingdom. In Daniel 2:34-35, 44, we read, You were perceiving until a stone was severed from a mountain, not by hands, and it collided with the image at its feet of iron and clay and pulverized them. Then, all at once, the iron, the clay, the copper, the silver and the gold were pulverized and became as chaff from summer threshing sites; and the wind lifted them up, and not trace at all was found of them. And the stone that collided with the image became a vast mountain range and filled the whole earth….In their days, that is, of these kings, the God of the heavens shall set up a kingdom that for the eons shall not come to harm, nor shall His kingdom be left to another people. It shall pulverize and terminate all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for the eons.”

Thus, the expression “kingdom of the heavens” is simply another way of referring to the kingdom prophesied in the above passage (which is the kingdom that the God of the heavens shall set up), and is perfectly consistent with the fact that it is on the earth that this kingdom will be established when Christ returns (Matt. 6:10; 13:41, 43; Luke 21:31). And, although the kingdom of God on the earth will have dominion over the entire earth (with all other kingdoms being under its authority), the geographical territory of the kingdom of God will be the land of Israel (with the city of Jerusalem on Mount Zion being the capital of the kingdom; see Jer. 3:17; Zech. 8:22; 14:4-21; cf. Rev. 14:1). The enthronement of Christ after his return to earth (as referred to in Matthew 19:28 and 25:31) will mark the beginning of the fulfillment of the following prophecy from Jeremiah 23:5: “Behold, the days are coming, declares Yahweh, when I will raise up for David a righteous Branch, and he shall reign as king and deal wisely, and shall execute justice and righteousness in the land.” 

In Rev. 20:1-8 we learn that, for the first thousand years of this kingdom, Satan will be bound and unable to deceive the nations of the earth. We also read that certain resurrected saints will “live and reign with Christ” for this period of time (:4-6). Among the saints resurrected to live and reign with Christ during this future time will include all who are to be martyred under the regime of the “wild beast” during the 3.5 years of “great affliction” leading up to Christ’s return (Rev. 13:1-8, 15; cf. Matt. 24:15-22). In Jer. 30:7, this period of great affliction is referred to as the “time of Jacob’s trouble” (which distinguishes it as a time that will distinctly involve God’s covenant people, Israel). These saints are undoubtedly the same as those referred to in Daniel 7:23-27, who we’re told will be persecuted for 3.5 years by the “fourth beast” of Daniel’s vision, but will subsequently be given “the kingdom and dominion and the greatness of the kingdoms under the whole heaven” (cf. Daniel 9:24, where we find that the final seven years leading up to the commencement of the reign of the “saints of the Most High” will be for Daniel’s people – i.e., Israel – and the “holy city,” Jerusalem). And in Rev. 5:10 we read that those belonging to this category of saints “shall be reigning on the earth.” This is further confirmed in Revelation 20:7-9, where “the citadel of the saints and the beloved city” from which they’ll be reigning for at least a thousand years is clearly located on the earth.

The event referred to in Daniel 7:27 (when the saints among God’s covenant people, Israel, receive the kingdom) is what Christ’s twelve apostles had in mind in Acts 1:6, when they asked him, “Lord, art Thou at this time restoring the kingdom to Israel?” Evidently, it was concerning this important subject that Christ had been teaching them during the forty days preceding his ascension to heaven: “…through holy spirit directing the apostles whom He chooses, to whom He presents Himself alive after His suffering, with many tokens, during forty days, being visualized to them and telling that which concerns the kingdom of God (Acts 1:2-3).

That the kingdom concerning which Christ taught the twelve apostles before and after his resurrection is, in fact, the earthly kingdom that is to be restored to Israel is further confirmed from the fact that this future kingdom is associated with a judgment that Christ referred to as being cast into “Gehenna,” or Hinnom Valley (which, in most Bibles, is unfortunately translated “hell”). In Matthew 18:1-9 we read the following:

Now in that hour the disciples came to Jesus, saying, "Who, consequently, is greatest in the kingdom of the heavens?" And, calling a little child to Him, He stands it in their midst, and said, "Verily, I am saying to you, If you should not be turning and becoming as little children, you may by no means be entering into the kingdom of the heavens. Who, then, will be humbling himself as this little child, he is the greatest in the kingdom of the heavens. And whosoever should be receiving one such little child in My name is receiving Me. Yet whoever should be snaring one of these little ones who is believing in Me, it is expedient for him that a millstone requiring an ass to turn it may be hanged about his neck, and he should be sunk in the open ocean.

Woe to the world because of snares! For it is a necessity for snares to be coming. Moreover, woe to that man through whom the snare is coming! Now, if your hand or your foot is snaring you, strike it off and cast it from you. Is it ideal for you to be entering into life maimed or lame, or, having two hands or two feet, to be cast into the fire eonian? And if your eye is snaring you, wrench it out and cast it from you. Is it ideal for you to be entering into life one-eyed, or, having two eyes, to be cast into the Gehenna of fire?

In the above passage, it’s evident that “entering into the kingdom of the heavens” and “entering into life” (i.e., eonian life) are synonymous in meaning (cf. Matt. 19:13-17, 23-24). But when and where will this “Gehenna of fire” judgment take place? The last verses of the book of Isaiah can, I believe, help us out here. After describing certain events that will precede and be concurrent with the restoration of the kingdom to Israel (see Isaiah 66:7-22), the prophet went on to describe the state of affairs that will characterize the eon to come as follows:

From new moon to new moon, and from Sabbath to Sabbath, all flesh shall come to worship before me, declares Yahweh. And they shall go out and look on the dead bodies of the men who have rebelled against me. For their worm shall not die, their fire shall not be quenched, and they shall be an abhorrence to all flesh.”

When we compare these verses with what Christ said in Mark 9:42-48, it’s clear that the reference to the undying worm and unquenchable fire (which will be consuming the dead bodies of those “who have rebelled against [God]”) refers to the judgment that Christ referred to as being “cast into Gehenna.” Thus, we can conclude that Christ had Isaiah 66:23-24 (among other prophetic passages) in mind when he referred to certain people being cast into Gehenna. And since that which is being described in Isaiah 66 pertains to conditions on the earth during the eon to come (specifically, in and around Jerusalem), we can conclude that it is the kingdom of God on earth (i.e., the kingdom that is to be restored to Israel) concerning which Christ was teaching during his earthly ministry.

Moreover, we know that many (perhaps most) of the Israelites in the kingdom that is to be restored to Israel will not have died before it is established at Christ’s return. These Israelites will enter the kingdom of God with mortal, flesh-and-blood bodies. That there will, in fact, be mortal, flesh-and-blood Israelites enjoying an allotment in the kingdom of God on earth is confirmed from a number of passages in the Hebrew Scriptures where the future kingdom is in view (see, for example, Isaiah 11:6-8; 65:20-25; Jeremiah 23:3-6; 30:18-20 (cf. v. 3); 33:10-11, 19-22; 59:20-21; Ezekiel 36:8-12; 37:25-26; 44:20-25). In these and other verses, we read of things said concerning people in the millennial kingdom during the eon to come - including the priests who will be ministering in the temple - that can only be said of mortal, flesh-and-blood Israelites, and in which only those who are mortal will be involved during this time (such as marrying and “multiplying” in the land). And dwelling among these flesh-and-blood Israelites (and further populating the kingdom with the children they will be having during this time) will be the Gentiles referred to in Ezekiel 47:22-23 (who I’ve argued elsewhere will be the “sheep” of Matthew 25:31-46; see the following article for a more in-depth defense of this position: http://thathappyexpectation.blogspot.com/2018/04/the-judgment-of-sheep-and-goats-study_18.html).

Let’s now summarize what we find affirmed in the above passages concerning the covenant-based expectation of the nation of Israel:

1. In the eon to come, God’s covenant people, Israel, will be dwelling in the land that God promised them (the boundaries of which are specified in Numbers 34:1-15 and elsewhere), and it is here that God will be multiplying them.

2. The land occupied by God’s covenant people will be the geographical territory of the kingdom of God (or “kingdom of the heavens”) that is going to be established on the earth when Christ returns, and from which “the saints of the Most High” will be reigning and exercising dominion over the entire earth.

3. In this kingdom, God’s covenant people will be caused to walk in the ordinances and observe the statutes of the law that God gave to them (for God will have put his laws into their minds and written them on their hearts).

4. The capital city of the kingdom that is to be restored to Israel will be Jerusalem (Isaiah 2:1-4; 30:19; 33:20; 52:1-2; Jer. 3:17; 30:18-20; Zech. 8:22; 14:4-21), which is referred to as “the beloved city” in Rev. 20:9.

5. God’s sanctuary (i.e., the magnificent temple we find described in great detail in the last few chapters of Ezekiel) will be “in their midst for the eon,” and by this the rest of the nations will know that God has hallowed the nation of Israel.

The expectation of the twelve apostles

We know that the twelve apostles belonged to a company of believers that predated the death and resurrection of Christ. In Luke 12:32, Christ referred to this company of believers as the “little flock.” This “little flock” was a company of believers that was constituted by those among God’s covenant people to whom God will be giving the kingdom (in contrast with those among God’s covenant people who won’t be entering the kingdom and enjoying the allotment of eonian life during this future time).

It’s also clear that the “little flock” – which, in Christ’s day, clearly had a calling and expectation in accord with Israel’s covenant-based promises – didn’t cease to exist after Christ’s death and resurrection. Rather, it simply grew larger. In Acts 2:36, Peter concluded his first public message as follows: “Let all the house of Israel know certainly, then, that God makes Him Lord as well as Christ -- this Jesus Whom you crucify! The fact that Jesus of Nazareth is “Lord as well as Christ” is, of course, the essential truth constituting the “gospel of the Circumcision.” We then read the following in verses 37-47:

Now, hearing this, their heart was pricked with compunction. Besides, they said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “What should we be doing, men, brethren?” Now Peter is averring to them, “Repent and be baptized each of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the pardon of your sins, and you shall be obtaining the gratuity of the holy spirit. For to you is the promise and to your children, and to all those afar, whosoever the Lord our God should be calling to Him.” Besides, with more and different words, he conjures and entreated them, saying, “Be saved from this crooked generation!” Those indeed, then, who welcome his word, are baptized, and there were added in that day about three thousand souls. Now they were persevering in the teaching of the apostles, and in fellowship, and in the breaking of bread, and in prayers. Now on every soul came fear, yet many miracles and signs occurred through the apostles in Jerusalem. Besides, great fear was on all. Now all those who believe also were in the same place and had all things in common. And they disposed of the acquisitions and the properties, and divided them to all, forasmuch as some would have had need. Besides persevering day by day with one accord in the sanctuary, besides breaking bread home by home, they partook of nourishment with exultation and simplicity of heart, praising God and having favor for the whole people. Now the Lord added those being saved day by day in the same place.

For more examples of people being added to this company of believers, see Acts 4:4, 5:14 and 11:24. Although the growth of this company of saints seemed to slow down significantly by the time that Paul was called on the road to Damascus, we know that in the late 50’s A.D., the “little flock” consisted of “tens of thousands” of believing, law-keeping Jews (see Acts 21:20). And the leaders of this company of believers were, from the beginning, the twelve apostles chosen by Christ (with Mathias replacing Judas; see Acts 1:15-26). It’s also clear that James, the (half) brother of our Lord, quickly gained a position of prominence within the Jerusalem ecclesia.

It would seem that, among those who believe the twelve apostles to have been members of the body of Christ, the “burden of proof” is thought to be on those who deny that they were. But this, to me, is to have it completely backwards. The twelve apostles were clearly members of a company of saints that had a calling and expectation in accord with Israel’s covenant-based expectation, and which predated both the death and resurrection of Christ and the later formation of the body of Christ. Thus, the burden of proof is on those who deny that the twelve remained a part of this company of saints throughout their lifetime.

That the calling and expectation of these twelve chosen leaders of the “little flock” never ceased to be in accord with Israel’s covenant-based expectation is, I believe, evident from what Christ himself declared concerning the twelve apostles in Matthew 19:28 (for the sake of context, I’ll include verses 23-29):

23 Now Jesus said to His disciples, "Verily, I am saying to you that the rich squeamishly will be entering into the kingdom of the heavens.
24 Yet again, I am saying to you that it is easier for a camel to be entering through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to be entering into the kingdom of God."
25 Now, hearing it, the disciples were tremendously astonished, saying, "Who, consequently, can be saved?"
26 Now, looking at them, Jesus said to them, "With men this is impossible, yet with God all is possible."
27 Then, answering, Peter said to Him, "Lo! we leave all and follow Thee. What, consequently, will it be to us?"
28 Yet Jesus said to them, "Verily, I am saying to you, that you who follow Me, in the renascence whenever the Son of Mankind should be seated on the throne of His glory, you also shall sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.
29 And everyone who leaves houses, or brothers, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or fields, on account of My name, a hundred-fold shall be getting, and shall be enjoying the allotment of life eonian.

As has been previously argued, the kingdom of the heavens/kingdom of God that Christ had in view here is the kingdom of God that is to be established on the earth at Christ’s return (i.e., the kingdom that is to be restored to Israel). It is in this kingdom that “the allotment of life eonian” will be enjoyed by those faithful followers of Christ whom Christ had in view in v. 29, and into which “the rich squeamishly will be entering” (apparently because of their reluctance to do all that is necessary – such as parting with their wealth - to becoming faithful follower of Christ, as is required for an Israelite to enter into this kingdom).

In light of the unfortunate response of the rich man with whom Christ is recorded as speaking in the verses preceding the above passage (whose refusal to become a follower of Christ led to the exchange between Christ and his disciples found in verses 23-26), Peter reminded Jesus that he and the rest of the twelve disciples had left all to follow him. What would they receive from Christ for their obedience and faithfulness? Christ revealed what their allotment would be in v. 28: ”Verily, I am saying to you, that you who follow Me, in the renascence whenever the Son of Mankind should be seated on the throne of His glory, you also shall sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.”

We read of this same promise in Luke 22:28-30:

“Now you are those who have continued with Me in My trials. And I am covenanting a covenant with you, according as My Father covenanted a kingdom to Me, that you may be eating and drinking at My table in My kingdom. And you will be seated on thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.

The location of the twelve thrones that Christ promised the twelve apostles (“you who follow Me” and “you who have continued with Me”) will clearly be on the earth, for that is where the “throne of [Christ’s] glory” will be after Christ returns (specifically, the city of Jerusalem, as noted earlier). Concerning the judicial role of the twelve apostles, passages such as Exodus 18:13-27, Deut. 16:18-20 and 2 Chron. 19:5-7 make it clear that the role of judges in Israel was ongoing and required the continual presence of the judges in the land to settle whatever controversies arose among the people. As the ones who will be “judging the twelve the tribes of Israel,” the twelve apostles will necessarily be carrying out their judicial role for as long as the twelve tribes of Israel are dwelling in the land promised to Israel (which will be for at least a thousand years).

As the ones appointed to judge the twelve tribes during the eon to come, we can conclude that the twelve apostles will be among those whom we’re told in Rev. 5:10 will be made “a kingdom and a priesthood for our God,” and who “shall be reigning on the earth.” They will take part in what Christ called “the resurrection of the just” (Luke 14:14) and which John referred to as “the former resurrection” (Rev. 20:4-6). In fact, in verse 4, John wrote the following: “And I perceived thrones, and they are seated on them, and judgment was granted to them.” Some have wondered why John (or rather, the One who inspired John to write what he did) didn’t provide the reader with more information concerning the identity of the “they” and “them” referred to in this verse. However, in light of Christ’s words in Matthew 19:28, the identity of the people whom John saw sitting on thrones (and to whom “judgment was granted”) shouldn’t be too mysterious to the reader.

Since the allotment promised by Christ to the twelve apostles remained their expectation throughout their lives, we can conclude that the twelve apostles remained members of the same “little flock” company of believers to which they belonged when Christ first declared the words recorded in Matt. 19:28.

I’ll close part two of this study with the following argument:

1. Those chosen to judge the twelve tribes of Israel will be dwelling among the twelve tribes of Israel in the land that God promised to Israel, and will be among “the saints of the Most High” who will be living and reigning on the earth during the eon to come.
2. The twelve apostles were chosen to judge the twelve tribes of Israel.
3. The twelve apostles will be dwelling among the twelve tribes of Israel in the land that God promised to Israel, and will be among “the saints of the Most High” who will be living and reigning on the earth during the eon to come.


God’s covenant people: Why most believing Jews in Paul’s day weren’t in the body of Christ (Part One)

Introduction

According to popular Christian belief, everyone who could be considered a "believer" during the period of time covered by the book of Acts (i.e., the “apostolic era”) was a member of that company of saints that the apostle Paul referred to as “the church which is [Christ’s] body” (Ephesians 1:22-23). What I’m going to be arguing in this study is that this popular position is mistaken. I believe that, from the very beginning of the apostolic era, the majority of believing Jews (including the twelve apostles) belonged to a different company of believers than that to which those in the body of Christ belong.

Among those who hold to the position I’m going to be defending, some would say that the question of how many gospels (or "evangels") there are is the key to determining whether or not this position is correct. Now, it is my conviction that there were, in fact, two distinct gospel being heralded during the apostolic era (which is a position I’ve defended in greater depth elsewhere; see http://thathappyexpectation.blogspot.com/2016/10/a-study-on-two-evangels-part-1.html). I also believe that the question of how many gospels were being heralded during this time is an important one, and relevant to this subject. However, I also believe that, when seeking to determine whether or not every believer during the apostolic era was a member of the body of Christ, the question of how many gospels there are is secondary in importance to what I would consider to be a more fundamental issue.

As a way of introducing what I believe to be the more fundamental issue, let’s consider Galatians 2:7 (for, in addition to supporting the “two gospels” position, I believe this verse points us in the direction of the more fundamental issue that I have in mind): “But, on the contrary, perceiving that I have been entrusted with the evangel of the Uncircumcision, according as Peter of the Circumcision…” Despite the attempts by some to reconcile this verse with the position that there was only one gospel being heralded during the apostolic era, I’ve argued elsewhere that this verse really does contradict the more popular view. When Paul wrote of the gospel "of the Uncircumcision" and the gospel “of the Circumcision,” he did not have in view one gospel that was being heralded to two different categories of people. Rather, Paul clearly had in mind two distinct gospels which pertained to two different categories of human beings – i.e., those described as “the Circumcision” and those described as “the Uncircumcision.” The grammar itself bears this out; the same Greek construction found in Gal. 2:7 is also found in the expression, “evangel of the kingdom” (which, of course, does not refer to a gospel that was being heralded to the kingdom, but rather to a gospel that distinctly pertained to the kingdom). Thus, those who are inclined to deny that Paul had in mind two distinct gospels when he wrote this verse will have to wrestle with this fact.

Moreover, when we take into consideration the simple fact that the gospel entrusted to Paul to herald among the nations involves the truth that "Christ died for our sins" (1 Cor. 15:3), logic dictates that any message we find recorded in scripture in which this truth is absent cannot be the gospel that Christ entrusted to Paul to herald among the nations (or at the very least, it can’t be understood as a complete articulation or expression of this gospel).

Consider the following logical argument:

1. The gospel which was entrusted to Paul to herald among the nations essentially involves the truth that Christ died for our sins.
2. The gospel that was heralded by Peter and Paul among the Jews (of which we have three separate examples in the book of Acts) did not contain the truth that Christ died for our sins.
3. The gospel that Peter and Paul heralded among the Jews was not the same gospel entrusted to Paul to herald among the nations.

We could make a similar argument concerning the gospel heralded by Peter to Cornelius and his household:

1. The gospel which was entrusted to Paul to herald among the nations essentially involves the truth that Christ died for our sins.
2. The gospel that was heralded by Peter to Cornelius and his household (Acts 10:34-43) did not contain the truth that Christ died for our sins.
3. The gospel that Peter heralded to Cornelius and his household was not the same gospel entrusted to Paul to herald among the nations.

Despite the tendency of some on both sides of the debate to make the matter more complicated than it is (something of which I may very well have been guilty at times), I believe it really is as simple and straightforward as the arguments above. One has to ignore the truth that Christ died for our sins in order to maintain the position that only one gospel was heralded during the apostolic era. For as soon as one puts the focus on this particular truth, the “one gospel” position quickly begins to fall apart.

It may be objected that, if the truth that Christ died for our sins is essential to the gospel entrusted to Paul to herald among the nations, this would mean that there is not a single explicit presentation of Paul’s gospel recorded in the entire book of Acts (which is what I do, in fact, believe).  But rather than being inconsistent with the “two gospels” position, this is precisely what we’d expect to be the case if this position were true. The book of Acts is a continuation of Luke’s Gospel Account, and was never intended to reveal truth that pertains distinctly to “the administration of the secret” which was given to Paul for the sake of the nations (Eph. 3:2, 9). Consider the remarkable fact that the longest message we find recorded in Acts that involves Paul and the nations (Acts 17:18-33) doesn’t even include the fact that Christ died for our sins. However, rather than understanding this message as a complete presentation of Paul’s gospel, what we read in Acts 17:18-33 is actually the introduction to an evangelistic message which - due to the negative response Paul received from the philosophers when he introduced the subject of Christ’s resurrection - Paul was unable (or unwilling) to finish. This means that the longest message we find recorded in Acts involving Paul and the nations is not even a complete message.

The fact that Paul’s message in Acts 17 was “cut short” on this occasion (which is in striking contrast with the lengthy message by Paul we find recorded in Acts 13:16-41) is, I believe, providential. This enabled Luke to include as much of Paul’s message as possible (thus giving his readers a glimpse into how Paul introduced the proclamation of his gospel on at least one occasion) without having to include those elements of Paul’s gospel that distinguished it from the gospel of the Circumcision, and which belonged to that body of truth which had been delivered to Paul to dispense among the nations. [1]

Now, the mere fact that there were two gospels being heralded during the apostolic era does not really explain or help us understand why there were two gospels being heralded. Nor does it really help us better understand why it would be the case that the majority of believing Jews weren’t in the body of Christ (as opposed to the body of Christ being comprised of every Jewish and Gentile believer on the earth). One could come to believe that there were, in fact, two gospels being heralded, and yet still be confused as to why the twelve apostles (for example) shouldn’t be understood as having been members of the body of Christ.

I think we begin to approach the more fundamental issue when we consider why Paul referred to one gospel as being “of the Uncircumcision” and to the other as being “of the Circumcision.” Circumcision is, of course, the sign of God’s covenant with Israel. Thus, in referring to the gospel entrusted to Peter as the gospel “of the Circumcision,” Paul was emphasizing the fact that this gospel was distinctly for God’s covenant people, and was the gospel through which God’s covenant people were being called to their covenant-based expectation (and, I believe, will be called in the future, after the body of Christ has been removed from the earth). Conversely, by referring to the gospel entrusted to him as “the evangel of the Uncircumcision,” Paul was emphasizing the fact that this gospel was distinctly for the nations, without any relation to Israel as a covenant people or to Israel’s covenant-based expectation. Those called through this distinct gospel did not need to be in a relationship with God based on God’s covenant with Israel (or in any positive relationship with God’s covenant people) in order to receive salvation.

Since the time that God began forming the nation of Israel, it has been possible to divide all of humanity up into two basic categories of people: (1) those who are in covenant with God and (2) those who aren’t. Both of these broad divisions could then, of course, be further divided into other important categories (i.e., believer and unbeliever, faithful and unfaithful, etc.). However, the fact that Israel is, and always has been, God’s covenant people is a truth with which every student of scripture should be familiar. A failure to realize or appreciate the covenant-based distinction that God has made between human beings will, I believe, inevitably lead to muddled, inconsistent doctrinal positions.

In Romans 11:1, Paul referred to Israel as “[God’s] people.” And in Romans 9:4 we read that the “covenants” belong to Israel (making Israel – and no other nation on earth - God’s covenant people). In Genesis 17:1-14, we discover how the formation of God’s covenant people began: God appeared to Abram and made a covenant - i.e., a contractual agreement - with him and his physical descendants. So important was this covenant with Abram that God changed Abram’s name to Abraham (“father of a multitude”). This so-called “Abrahamic covenant” - which can be understood as several related covenants - promised Abraham’s descendants a special and unique relationship with God. It also promised his descendants a land (Gen. 15:18), the boundaries of which would be specified in greater detail later (e.g., Numbers 34:1-15). After receiving the sign of the covenant – i.e., circumcision - Abraham became the first “father” or “patriarch” of the nation of Israel. The Abrahamic covenant was confirmed to his son Isaac and grandson Jacob (Genesis 17:19, 28:13-15), and the covenant sign of circumcision was later incorporated into the law given to Moses (Leviticus 12:3).

Other covenants between God and Israel followed the Abrahamic covenant, with each covenant building upon the one(s) preceding it (which means that an understanding and appreciation of each subsequent covenant with Israel requires an understanding of the covenant(s) that preceded it). However, for the purpose of this study, it need only be emphasized that each of Israel’s covenants can be said to deal with one (or both) of the following: Israel’s obligation and Israel’s expectation. As I hope to demonstrate, an understanding and appreciation of Israel’s covenant-based expectation and obligation will lead one to the logical conclusion that most believing Jews in Paul’s day were not in the body of Christ. In the next installment of this study, I’ll be focusing on Israel’s covenant-based expectation; and in part three, I’ll shift the focus to Israel’s covenant-based obligation. And in part four, I’ll argue that those in the body of Christ (whether they happen to be circumcised or uncircumcised) share in neither Israel’s covenant-based expectation nor Israel’s covenant-based obligation. 





[1] The conspicuous absence of a complete presentation of Paul’s gospel in the book of Acts (and the cutting short of Paul’s message in Acts 17) can thus be understood as confirming the following position articulated by A.E. Knoch on page 200 of his commentary:

“…it is of the utmost importance for us to note that the account in Acts never attains to the truth taught in [Paul’s] epistles. It leads us up to some of it, but never makes actual contact with it. It prepares for it but does not proclaim it. Not one single doctrine for the present secret economy is found in the book of Acts, though all was made known and committed to writing during this period. We are continually led up to, but never enter into the grace which is ours in Christ Jesus. Acts is not a record of the beginning of the present, but a treatise on the end of the previous dispensation. Most of the ecclesiastical confusion which prevails would vanish if this record of the kingdom apostasy were left where it belongs, and all truth for the present based on Paul's written revelation, which deals with the same period of time, but deals with it from an entirely distinct standpoint.”

Wednesday, August 1, 2018

A Ransom For All: Why Every Human Being Will Be Saved (Part Three)

RANSOMED FROM DEATH

In part two of this study, I argued that the salvation of all humanity is a truth clearly revealed by what Paul wrote in 1 Timothy 2:3-6. As Mr. Screws remarked, “No one can read 1 Tim. 2:3-6, and believe every word of it, without believing in the salvation of all humanity.“ Because Christ gave himself a “correspondent ransom for all,” it follows that all mankind will, in fact, be ransomed and therefore saved. But ransomed from what? In part one of this study, I argued that it is from their sins that the “many” for whom Christ gave his soul a ransom will be saved. And I believe that the same can be said for the “all” for whom Christ gave himself a “correspondent ransom.” But what more can be said about the salvation that Christ secured for all mankind when he gave himself a ransom for all?

In his letter to the saints in Corinth, Paul made it clear that Christ’s death was essential to his evangel (or “gospel”), and referred to the message he heralded as “the word of the cross,” and as essentially involving “Christ crucified” (1 Cor. 1:17-18, 21-24; 2:1-2). Later, in chapter fifteen, Paul reminded the believers to whom he wrote of the evangel which he’d brought to them, and – in doing so - provided his readers with the reason why Christ’s death is so essential to his evangel. In 1 Cor. 15:1-5, Paul wrote:

Now I am making known to you, brethren, the evangel which I bring to you, which also you accepted, in which also you stand, through which also you are saved, if you are retaining what I said in bringing the evangel to you, outside and except you believe feignedly. For I give over to you among the first what also I accepted, that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures, and that He was entombed, and that He has been roused the third day according to the scriptures, and that He was seen by Cephas, thereupon by the twelve.

What does it mean for Christ to have “died for our sins?” In short, it means that Christ died to save us from our sins. But what does this mean? Well, those who haven’t yet been saved from their sins are described by Paul in 1 Cor. 15:17-19 as follows: “Now if Christ has not been roused, vain is your faith – you are still in your sins! Consequently those also, who are put to repose in Christ, perished. If we are having an expectation in Christ in this life only, more forlorn than all men are we.”

For anyone to still be “in [their] sins” means that God is still reckoning their sins/offenses to them (cf. Rom. 4:8; 2 Cor. 5:19), and that they remain under the condemnation of which their sins have made them deserving (cf. John 8:24). That this is the case is evident from the fact that, in v. 18, it’s implied those who have died while still being “in their sins” have “perished.” The word translated “perished” in v. 18 (apollumi) does not simply mean “died,” for the saints to whom Paul was referring were already dead at the time he was writing. In the context, the contrast is between “perishing” and being “vivified” (or “made alive”) “in Christ” (:20-23). Thus, for one to have “perished” means that one remains under the condemnation of death, and will not be given life beyond the dominion of death. And from this it follows that being “still in your sins” means remaining under the condemnation of death as well (i.e., being deserving of death).

That death is the condemnation of which our sins make us deserving is further confirmed from what Paul wrote in 1 Cor. 15:54-57. After referring to the miraculous change that both the dead and the living saints in the body of Christ will undergo at the time of the snatching away or “rapture” (1 Cor. 15:50-53; cf. 1 Thess. 4:15-17), Paul declared, “Now, whenever this corruptible should be putting on incorruption and this mortal should be putting on immortality, then shall come to pass the word which is written, Swallowed up was Death by Victory. Where, O Death, is your victory? Where, O Death, is your sting? Now the sting of Death is sin, yet the power of sin is the law. Now thanks be to God, Who is giving us the victory, through our Lord Jesus Christ.”

In verses 54-55, Paul is quoting from Isaiah 25:8 and Hosea 13:14. Given its relevance to this study, it’s worth noting that immediately before the part of Hosea 13:14 quoted by Paul, we find God promising to “ransom” his rebellious people Israel “from the grip of the unseen” (i.e., Hades, the state of death), and to “redeem” them from death. Since this particular promise was made to unfaithful Israel, it’s not surprising that Paul didn’t quote this part of Hosea 13:14 when writing to those in the body of Christ. [1] Nonetheless, we can conclude that, based on this verse (as well as others)[2], Paul would’ve been familiar with the idea of death as being something from which mankind was in need of being “ransomed” by God.

But what did Paul mean by, “Now the sting of death is sin?” The word translated “sting” denotes a pointed instrument used to injure and inflict pain (cf. Acts 26:14; Rev. 9:10). Paul was essentially saying here that sin is what gives death the power to injure us. Apart from sin, death would have no power over us. Sin is the cause, and death is the effect. It is, in fact, the judicial consequence of sin that is common to all people. Thus, for Christ to have “died for our sins” means that he died to save us from the condemnation of which our sins made us deserving. And based on everything we read in 1 Corinthians 15, we can conclude that this condemnation is death.

That death is the God-ordained consequence of sin is further confirmed in the opening chapters of Genesis. In Genesis 2:16-17, God declared the following to Adam: “From every tree of the garden you may eat, yea eat. But from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, you must not eat from it; for on the day you eat from it, to die, you shall be dying. In accordance with this stated consequence for Adam’s disobedience, we read that, on the very day that Adam sinned, the death sentence was passed upon him (Gen. 3:19). As a result of this sentence, both Adam and his wife – and, by extension, all of their future posterity - were banished from the Garden of Eden and denied access to the tree of life (vv. 22-24). Humanity was, in other word, excluded from the only means by which we could’ve lived indefinitely on the earth without the inevitability of death.[3] 

From this early episode in mankind’s history we learn that all humanity became deserving of death because of Adam’s sin, with every one of his descendants coming into existence under the power and “reign” of death. Paul makes this fact clear in Romans 5:12-14: “Therefore, even as through one man sin entered into the world, and through sin death, and thus death passed through into all mankind, on which all sinned -- for until law sin was in the world, yet sin is not being taken into account when there is no law; nevertheless death reigns from Adam unto Moses, over those also who do not sin in the likeness of the transgression of Adam, who is a type of Him Who is about to be.”

In verse 12, Paul wrote that “death passed through into all mankind…” And then, in v. 18, death is referred to as the “condemnation” that “all mankind” came to be under “through one offense” (i.e., through the one offense of Adam). But it is not only because of Adam’s sin that death “reigns” over mankind. Although Adam’s sin affected the entire human race (which can be understood as demonstrating Adam’s representative relationship to the rest of mankind), what we read concerning Adam’s sin and condemnation reveals the consequence of sin for all of his sinning descendants, as well. This is evident from Romans 1:32, where - after listing a number of sins (among which most human beings could find at least one of which they’re guilty of committing) - Paul declared that “those committing such things are deserving of death.

Similarly, in Romans 6:22 Paul wrote that the “consummation” of the things that people do as “slaves of sin” is “death”; in the next verse, Paul (personifying sin as if it were a human slave master) adds that “the ration of Sin is death” – i.e., it is the “fixed portion” that Adam’s sinning descendants can expect to receive, as the ultimate consequence of their own sins. Thus, when those who are deserving of death because of their sins actually die, their death is not only because of Adam’s sin; it is because of their own sins as well (which are just as “condemning” as was Adam’s sin). 

It is this problem that Christ died to resolve when he “died for our sins.” And, if Paul’s testimony is to be believed (and I think that it is), Christ was 100% successful at resolving it. It is now only a matter of time before all are released from the condemnation of death of which sin makes us deserving. This is confirmed by Paul in Romans 5:15-19:

15 But not as the offense, thus also the grace. For if, by the offense of the one, the many died, much rather the grace of God and the gratuity in grace, which is of the One Man, Jesus Christ, to the many superabounds.
16 And not as through one act of sinning is the gratuity. For, indeed, the judgment is out of one into condemnation, yet the grace is out of many offenses into a just award.
17 For if, by the offense of the one, death reigns through the one, much rather, those obtaining the superabundance of grace and the gratuity of righteousness shall be reigning in life through the One, Jesus Christ.
18 Consequently, then, as it was through one offense for all mankind for condemnation, thus also it is through one just award for all mankind for life's justifying.
19 For even as, through the disobedience of the one man, the many were constituted sinners, thus also, through the obedience of the One, the many shall be constituted just.

Some have objected that the words “the many” in v. 19 place a restriction on the words “all mankind” in v. 18. However, that’s not at all the case, for the same people referred to as “the many” in v. 15 were referred to as “all mankind” in v. 12 (into whom we’re told death – the consequence of sin - passed through). And with the exception of Christ, there is no human who wasn’t constituted a sinner and thus condemned to die as a result of Adam’s sin (this fact is confirmed by Rom. 3:23, where we’re told that “all sinned and are wanting of the glory of God”). Rather than placing a restriction on the words “all mankind,” Paul’s use of the expression “the many” (both in v. 15 and v. 19) serves to emphasize the fact that far more individuals were negatively affected by Adam’s sin – and far more positively affected by Christ’s obedience – than either Adam or Christ alone. The expression “the many” in verses 15 and 19 is, in other words, to be understood in contrast with “the one man,” Adam (whose disobedience negatively affected far more humans than himself) and the other “one man,” Jesus Christ (whose obedience positively affects far more humans than himself).[4]

The “obedience of the One” (v. 19) is an undeniable reference to Christ's sacrificial death on the cross, when he gave himself “a correspondent ransom for all.” Thus, the “grace of God” referred to in v. 15 (which we’re told “super-abounds” to all who were “constituted sinners”) involves that which Christ procured by his obedient death on behalf of all. According to Paul, just as all humanity fell under condemnation because of the disobedience of “the one man,” Adam, so all humanity will ultimately become the recipients of the grace secured by the obedience of Christ (who Paul referred to as both “the last Adam” and “the second Man” in 1 Cor. 15:45-47). And this means that all mankind – “the many” affected by the obedience of “the One” - “shall be constituted just.” Since the condemnation from which all will be saved when they’re constituted just is death, it follows that the justification in view necessarily involves a state in which all people will be vivified, or placed beyond the dominion of death: “Yet now Christ has been roused from among the dead, the Firstfruit of those who are reposing. For since, in fact, through a man came death, through a Man, also, comes the resurrection of the dead. For even as, in Adam, all are dying, thus also, in Christ, shall all be vivified.1 Cor. 15:20-22

For those who have died, to be vivified (or “made alive”) in Christ means more than just being resurrected. It means being resurrected into the same incorruptible, deathless state into which Christ was raised. For Paul later declared that death “is being abolished,” and the only that this could be the case is if all people are ultimately made immortal, and thus unable to die. That being vivified in Christ means to be given the same life that Christ has is further confirmed in 1 Cor. 15:42-44, where Paul describes the body that those resurrected will have as being incorruptible, glorious, powerful and spiritual (cf. :53-54). Thus, it follows that all mankind will ultimately receive the same “power of an indissoluble life” which, in Heb. 7:16, is said to be possessed by Christ.

After revealing that who are dying in Adam will be vivified in Christ, Paul went on to write in 1 Cor. 15:23-28:

Yet each in his own class: the Firstfruit, Christ; thereupon those who are Christ's in His presence; thereafter the consummation, whenever He may be giving up the kingdom to His God and Father, whenever He should be nullifying all sovereignty and all authority and power. For He must be reigning until He should be placing all His enemies under His feet. The last enemy is being abolished: death. For He subjects all under His feet. Now whenever He may be saying that all is subject, it is evident that it is outside of Him Who subjects all to Him. Now, whenever all may be subjected to Him, then the Son Himself also shall be subjected to Him Who subjects all to Him, that God may be All in all.

According to Paul, the “consummation” of which he wrote will occur “whenever [Christ] may be giving up the kingdom to his God and Father, whenever he should be nullifying all sovereignty and all authority and power.” Since the “last enemy” to be abolished is “death,” it follows that Christ will continue to reign until death is abolished, and that the “consummation” involves the abolishment of death. When death is abolished, Christ’s reign ends. Thus, the abolishing of death is the event by which Christ subjects himself to God so that God may be “All in all” (v. 28). Paul’s sequence of events in this passage, therefore, goes as follows: (1) Christ, “the Firstfruit,” is vivified; (2) “those who are Christ’s in His presence” are vivified; (3) the “the last enemy,” death, is “abolished” (which is the consummation), and God becomes “all in all.” And since the abolishing of death means that no death can remain, it follows that every human who has ever lived will be immortal when God becomes “all in all.”

Contrary to the belief of most Christians, there must be another category of human beings who will be vivified/made alive in Christ after the vivification of “those who are Christ’s in his presence.” Otherwise, it would not be true that all who are dying in Adam will be vivified in Christ. And this class of humanity constitutes a third and final “order” in Christ’s conquest of death. Thus, we can conclude that those who do not fall into the second category of those who are to be vivified in Christ will be vivified at a yet future time – i.e., when Christ’s reign ends, and he delivers the kingdom up to God.[5] It is at this future time that every human being not yet vivified will be vivified.[6]

In Paul’s second letter to Timothy, he wrote: “Christ Jesus…abolishes death, yet illuminates life and incorruption through the evangel of which I was appointed a herald and an apostle and a teacher of the nations” (2 Tim. 1:11). Concerning the tense of the word translated “abolishes” in this verse, A.E. Knoch notes in his commentary, “The abolition of death is put in the indefinite or aorist tense, as He [Christ] has done it in His own case and will do it for all in the future.” Death and “life and incorruption” are, of course, mutually exclusive states of affairs; the latter is the state of affairs that will exist when the former has been abolished. Since the abolishment of death means “life and incorruption” for all mankind, that which is illuminated through Paul’s evangel is the final destiny that awaits all mankind when death, the last enemy, is abolished. When all who are dying in Adam are vivified in Christ, death will be no more. “Life and incorruption” will be universal, characterizing the existence of all mankind. And the fact that life and incorruption is said to be “illuminated” through Paul’s evangel tells us that the truth of the salvation of all mankind from death is inherent in Paul’s evangel, and implied by what we read in 1 Cor. 15:3-5 and 1 Tim. 2:6.

Moreover, when we understand what it means for Christ to have “died for our sins,” we can also understand why Christ’s resurrection is just as essential to Paul’s evangel as his death for our sins. For, had Christ not been roused from among the dead by God, it would mean that Christ had not died in perfect obedience to God, and that he was just as much under the condemnation of death as the sinners for whom he died. And this would mean that Christ’s death did not actually procure mankind’s salvation. This would include those who believe Paul’s evangel: if Christ was not roused, then our faith is “vain” (1 Cor. 15:17) – i.e., our faith would be in something that never actually happened. And if that were the case, then – despite believing that we’ve been justified by the faith of Christ - we’d still be condemned, and deserving of death (or, as Paul says in 1 Cor. 15:18, we’d be “still in [our] sins”).

But since Christ was roused from among the dead, we know that Christ accomplished exactly what he died to accomplish: the procuring of mankind’s salvation. Everyone who is dying (or has already died) will be saved from the condemnation of which their sins made them deserving. In regard to Paul’s evangel, then, Christ’s resurrection is the confirmation and divine pledge that the salvation of all mankind was procured by Christ’s sacrificial death on our behalf. Christ’s resurrection is the God-given proof that the words triumphantly declared by our Lord just before he gave up his spirit on the cross - “It is accomplished!” - were not uttered in vain. Because Christ died for our sins and was roused by God from among the dead, we can have confidence that sin will ultimately be eliminated from the universe, and death will ultimately be abolished. 



[1] Paul knew that the only part of this prophecy that had any applicability to us is the part he actually quoted (and even then, we shouldn’t understand our being vivified as fulfilling any part of this prophecy; rather, it’s simply the case that what’s being stated will “come to pass” when we’re vivified).

[2] Other examples from the Hebrew Scriptures in which the word translated “ransom” in Hosea 13:14 (padah) refers to the ransoming of a person’s life from dying/death are Leviticus 27:29, 1 Samuel 14:45, Job 5:20, Job 33:28 and Psalm 49:15.

[3] Significantly, we find that those who will get to live on the new earth during the final eon will live without the fear and inevitability of death, and will have free access to the life-sustaining fruit of the “tree of life” to which Adam and Eve were denied access because of Adam’s sin (Rev. 21:1-4; 22:1-2).

[4] Some have objected that Paul would’ve used the word “all” instead of “many” in v. 19 if he’d had in mind “all mankind” here. However, Paul already used the word “all” in the previous verse (and it’s, of course, absurd to think that Paul thought his readers would suddenly forget this fact when they got to the very next verse). Paul simply modified the wording in order to place a greater emphasis on the two categories of people he had in view: the two men, Adam and Christ, and those affected by their respective actions (the rest of humanity). In contrast with two men (Adam and Christ), the rest of humanity can indeed be considered “many,” and thus be appropriately referred to by Paul as “the many.”

[5]  We know that Christ’s reign continues long after the vivification of “those who are Christ’s in his presence,” for Christ’s kingdom and reign over the earth (i.e., when he sits on “the throne of his glory”) does not even begin until after his return to earth (Matt. 19:28; 24:30; 25:31; cf. Luke 1:32-33; 22:30). And Christ’s reign over this present earth will last for more than a thousand years (Rev. 20:4-6; cf. 11:15). Christ’s throne and reign – along with the reign of the saints – will also continue during the time of the new heaven and new earth (Rev. 22:1, 5). And as long as Christ is reigning – indeed, as long as any “sovereignty,” “authority” and “power” continues (including that of the saints) – it means that the “consummation” has not yet come, and death (the “last enemy”) remains to be abolished.

It should also be noted that the kingdom which Paul said Christ is going to ultimately deliver to his God and Father is the same kingdom which Daniel had prophesied the Messiah would receive from God (see Dan. 7:13-14). And the implication is that this kingdom will, when given back to God, be full of subjects. But who will be the subjects of the kingdom that Christ is one day going to deliver up to his Father? Well, in this passage, we are told that “all” (ta panta, “the all” or “the universe”) is eventually going to be subjected to Christ. Significantly, God is said to be the only exception to the “all” that is to be subjected to Christ. This can only mean that all created, personal beings (both human and non-human) are included. Thus, the kingdom that Christ is ultimately going to deliver to his God and Father is going to consist of all created, personal beings.

[6] This will include those who were sentenced to the “lake of fire” and underwent the “second death” referred to by John in Revelation 20:11-15. Some may object that John doesn’t reveal that anyone will be saved from the second death. However, John recorded only what was revealed to him in the visions he received from God. What ultimately happens to those human beings who are to be cast into the lake of fire to die a second time was simply not a part of John’s vision, and was not meant to be revealed by him. This in no way means that this is the end of their story. If it was, it would mean that death is not going to be abolished by Christ. But this would contradict Paul, who (thankfully) provides us with further revelation on this subject.

According to Paul, Christ’s reign is going to continue until this “last enemy” is done away with. And we know from what John wrote in the chapters that follow (Rev. 21-22) that Christ - along with his saints - are still reigning during the period of time that immediately follows the judgment in which people are sentenced to the “second death” (i.e., the age of “the new heaven and new earth”). Thus, we can know that death has not yet been abolished during this future period of time (for Christ is still reigning and the second death is still in effect), and that the scene being described by Paul in 1 Cor. 15:24-28 will, during this time, still be a future reality.