The fact that most people have not been chosen by God and
will never believe the gospel in this lifetime does not mean God does not
love them, or that he has forsaken them. Most Christians believe that
there will be a permanent and eternal division between the members of the human
race. It is believed that there will be a permanent division between those who
are presently “holy and blameless in God’s sight,” and those who aren’t; a
division between those who presently love and obey God, and those who don’t; a
division between those who get to spend eternity in God’s presence, and those
who must remain eternally separated from him.
There are, of course, certain passages of Scripture are relied upon as supporting this common view. However, while Scripture does, in fact, speak of a division between people that has lasted – and will continue to last – for much of human history, it also reveals that God's story of redemption is not going to end this way. The few glimpses of the final scene of redemptive history which God has provided for us in Scripture (through the apostle Paul) do not depict a permanent division between human beings, and of multitudes of human beings in a state of eternal separation from God. Not only would this be a terrible and tragic ending to redemptive history, it would mean that God is either unable to accomplish his redemptive plan for all people, or that God is unwilling to save all people (and is thus less loving than he calls his children to be). Fortunately, the final scene with which Scripture presents us is much more beautiful and God-glorifying than this. Consider Paul’s words in Ephesians 1:9-10:
There are, of course, certain passages of Scripture are relied upon as supporting this common view. However, while Scripture does, in fact, speak of a division between people that has lasted – and will continue to last – for much of human history, it also reveals that God's story of redemption is not going to end this way. The few glimpses of the final scene of redemptive history which God has provided for us in Scripture (through the apostle Paul) do not depict a permanent division between human beings, and of multitudes of human beings in a state of eternal separation from God. Not only would this be a terrible and tragic ending to redemptive history, it would mean that God is either unable to accomplish his redemptive plan for all people, or that God is unwilling to save all people (and is thus less loving than he calls his children to be). Fortunately, the final scene with which Scripture presents us is much more beautiful and God-glorifying than this. Consider Paul’s words in Ephesians 1:9-10:
“…making known unto us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure which he purposed in him unto a dispensation of the fullness of the times, to sum up all things in Christ, the things in the heavens, and the things upon the earth…” (ASV)
What’s fascinating about this passage is that Paul is not only
telling us what God’s will is with regards to the ultimate destiny of everything
in the universe, but he's telling us that this “mystery” has been made known to
God’s elect – i.e., those whom God has chosen beforehand to believe Paul’s
gospel and become members of Christ’s body. So what is the "mystery" of God's will that has been made known to
those who are members of Christ’s body? It is this: that “all things” – both
“in the heavens” and “upon the earth” - will be summed up “in Christ!”
The
Greek word variously translated as “sum up” (ASV), "unite in" (ESV),
"summing up of," (NASB), "bring unity to" (NIV),
"gather together in one" (RSV) and “bring into one the whole” (YLT)
is anakephalaiomai. It is found only here and in Rom 13:9,
where Paul speaks of the entire law being "summed up" in the
commandment to love. In his “Modern English” translation, J.B. Phillips
beautifully captures the meaning of Paul’s words in verse 10: “For God had
allowed us to know the secret of his plan, and it is this: he purposes in his
sovereign will that all human history shall be consummated in Christ, that
everything that exists in Heaven or earth shall find its perfection and
fulfillment in him.”
According to Paul, Jesus Christ is ultimately destined
to “fill all things” (Eph 4:10). Christ has already sacrificed himself on
behalf of all sinners as the divine pledge of their redemption from sin and
their reconciliation to God (John 1:29; 12:32; 2 Cor. 5:19; Col 1:19; 1 Tim
2:3-6; 4:10; 1 John 2:2; 3:4-8). He was raised from the dead as the pledge that
death itself will one day be abolished, and that all people will ultimately be
made immortal (1 Cor. 15:20-22, 50-57; 2 Tim 1:10). And he has been made Lord
over all and given all authority in heaven and on earth to bring about this
glorious victory (Acts 2:36; 10:36; Rom 10:12; 14:9; Matt 28:18). However, we
do not yet see this victory fully manifested.
What was accomplished
prospectively through Christ’s death and resurrection has not yet been fully
realized in the universe. The kingdom of Satan has yet to be overthrown, and
both sin (which John calls the “works of the devil”) and death (which Paul
calls the “last enemy”) have yet to be abolished. Christ has not yet subjected
all to himself (1 Cor. 15:25-28; Heb 2:8-9), since many created beings – both
human and angelic – remain in a state of rebellion against him. Only a relative few can be said to have been “subjected to
Christ” and (prospectively) brought into his kingdom at this present time (Col 1:13). But just
as the church is presently subjected to Christ and under his headship (Eph. 5:22-24), so shall all created beings ultimately be subjected to him. And when
this time comes, all things in heaven and on earth will finally be unified
under Christ, Christ will finally “fill all things,” and God will finally be
“all in all” (1 Cor. 15:28).
When understood correctly, I submit that the scriptural doctrine of
election is fully consistent with this understanding of the consummation of
redemptive history, and does not entail such a deeply unsettling view of
God as that found in Calvinistic Christianity. Although (as noted
earlier) the traditional Christian view is that certain people were
selected by God to spend eternity with him in heaven while the rest are doomed
to be eternally separated from him in a place of conscious, fiery torment
(which is traditionally thought to be the “default fate” for sinners), election
in Scripture has nothing to do with avoiding such a fate. It is not about where
or how one will spend eternity. It is not about one’s final destiny at all.
To better understand the subject of election in the Bible,
consider the following examples of both individuals and corporate groups that
were “chosen” or “elect” according to God’s redemptive purpose: Israel (Isaiah
45:4; Deut 7:7; Acts 13:17; Romans 9:11; 11:28), Christ (Isaiah
42:1; Luke 9:35; 23:35; 1 Peter 2:4, 6), the twelve disciples (Luke
6:13; John 6:70; 13:18; 15:16, 19; Acts 1:2, 24-25) and the Apostle Paul (Acts
9:15; see also Acts 22:14; 1 Cor. 9:1, 15). In none of these cases does
election have anything to do with one’s being chosen by God to spend eternity
with him in heaven rather than being eternally separated from him in “hell.”
This is especially evident with Christ’s election: while Christ is said to be
“chosen” and “elect,” his being chosen and elect has nothing to do with his
spending his eternal destiny in one location rather than another (for of
course, Christ’s eternal destiny was never in question). Rather, Christ’s
election was all about his unique vocation and divine calling. Christ was
chosen for a certain redemptive mission, and that mission involved his
perfectly manifesting the will and character of God to the world, and his
faithfully doing the work of his Father (a work which culminated in his
sacrificial death on the cross for the sins of the world). And I submit that
Christ’s election is the paradigm for how the election of the believer should
be understood. Election is essentially about God’s choosing individuals or
groups of people ahead of time for certain important roles or tasks (e.g., lineage
and/or service). As was the case with Christ, to be elected or chosen by God
involves being given a certain office or vocation (which carries with it both
blessing/privilege and responsibility).
To better understand the significance of election, we should take
a look at Israel’s purpose in the Hebrew Scriptures or "Old Testament." In these Scriptures we find that God
singled out the nation of Israel to ultimately be a blessing to the rest of
the world. It is significant that God is recognized as not just God over
Israel but over the whole earth and all nations (e.g. Psalm 24, 96, 1 Chron.
29:11, etc.). Early in the Scriptural narrative, then, we find that God has a purpose
and a goal in regard to the inhabitants of this planet: blessing all the
families and nations of the earth through the (Jewish) offspring of Abraham
(Gen 12:3; 18:18; 22:18; 26:4; 28:14; Ps. 22:27; 67:2; 72:11; 82:8; 86:9;
Isaiah 25:6-8).
God’s special favor toward Israel stood at the center of his
plan to eventually bless the entire world. Just as God singled out Joseph from among his
brothers to be a blessing to the entire nation of Egypt, so the nation of
Israel was marked by God as the divinely chosen agent in ultimately mediating blessing to all nations (see Isaiah 61-66). As many students of
Scripture have noted, Jesus seems to be alluding to the original purpose
of Israel in choosing twelve Jewish disciples to continue God’s redemptive plan
for the world. Just as Israel was to be a light to the nations, the twelve
disciples were chosen to be a light to the rest of the darkened world (Matt
5:14), so that the world would know God and glorify him (5:16). The number
twelve is, of course, significant, as twelve is also the number of the tribes of Israel.
Just as national Israel is to be the agent through which God will
ultimately mediate redemption to the nations on earth, so the body of
Christ is to be the agent through which God makes known his manifold
wisdom to the rulers and authorities "among the
celestials" (Eph. 3:10; cf. Eph. 2:4-7). Paul said that those
who are “in Christ” by faith (i.e., those who are “members of his body”) were
chosen to be “holy and blameless in God's sight” (Eph. 1:4). They are also said
to be “predestined to be adopted through Jesus Christ” (v. 5). Paul isn’t
talking about anyone being chosen for one eternal destiny rather than another
here; he’s talking about what's true of believers now, and what will be true
of believers during the coming ages or "eons" of
Christ’s reign (Eph. 2:6-7).
Being “in Christ,” believers are presently considered
holy and blameless in God’s sight (that’s why they’re said to be “justified,”
and are always addressed as “saints” – even the ones who were in obvious need
of further spiritual growth!). Believers are also given the special status of
being “adopted” (a beautiful metaphor which Paul elaborates on in greater depth
in Galatians 3:23 through 4:7). Although this status enjoyed by believers
brings with it great privileges, believers are not blessed for their own sake
alone. Rather, believers are called to serve others (both now and in the
future) and to "wrestle" against the “principalities and powers” that
are in rebellion against God and hostile towards humanity (Eph 6:10-17). In the
Bible, election is always a vocational calling; the election of believers is
inseparable from their calling to humbly serve and be a blessing to others.
Elsewhere Paul writes that believers are "[God's]
workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared in
advance for them to walk in" (Eph 2:10).
God’s election of Jacob instead of Esau, and his “hating” Esau and
“loving” Jacob (Rom. 9:13; Mal. 1:2-3) is sometimes thought to support the idea
that God has permanently divided humanity into two groups, with one portion of
humanity destined for an eternity in heaven and another destined for an
eternity in “hell.” However, as noted earlier, God's election of individuals or
groups is always to historic and redemptive vocation (e.g., lineage and
service), and does not entail that those who weren't elected are eternally
doomed. God's "hatred" of Esau was no more a literal, personal hatred
of Esau and his national descendents than was Jacob’s "hatred" of
Leah (Gen 29:30-31). Nor was it any different than the "hatred"
Christ says we are to have toward our family and our own lives (Luke 14:26). It
was an idiomatic way of speaking common among the Hebrew people to use the
terms "love" and "hate" in a comparative sense, with
"love" denoting a greater regard or affection for someone, and
"hatred" denoting less regard or affection for someone (as opposed to
positive hatred or indifference).
God's "hatred" of Esau (that is,
the nation of Edom - Gen 25:23; Mal. 1:3-4) simply meant that, in contrast to
Jacob and his descendents, God had less regard towards Esau and his descendents
in relation to the outworking of his redemptive plan in history. In other
words, God’s love of Jacob (Israel) and his hatred of Esau (Edom) simply had
reference to the higher and more preeminent position of the Hebrew nation in
God’s sovereign purpose. Before Jacob and Esau were even born, God determined
that Esau’s nation, Edom, would not to be the chosen people and vessel through
which the Messiah would come, and through which he would ultimately bless all
the nations of the earth. To affirm that God literally and absolutely hates some
would be completely inconsistent with the God revealed by Jesus and his
apostles. According to Christ, God loves the world, including those who do not
(yet) love him (John 3:16; Mt. 5:43-48). And according to the apostle John,
God’s love for this sinful world defines his very essence (1 John 4:8-9, 14; cf.
1 John 2:2; 5:19).
But are not the non-elect said to be "vessels of wrath"
(that is, under God’s wrath), and to be "vessels of dishonor?"
Certainly, but nowhere does Scripture say or suggest that God’s wrath should be
understood as eternal conscious torment in “hell.” As far as Scripture reveals,
any divine wrath that fell upon Esau’s national descendants was confined to this
life (Isaiah 34:5-10; Mal. 1:2-3). It did not extend beyond this mortal,
earthly existence. Moreover, throughout his epistle to the Romans, Paul nowhere
speaks of God's wrath as something that will take place in “eternity,” during
the immortal state of man’s existence (Rom 1:18, 24, 26, 28, 32; 12:19; 13:2,
4). Like the wrath that fell upon Edom, the destruction of the "vessels of
wrath" of which Paul spoke (Rom 9:22) is also spoken of as being an
imminent temporal judgment “upon the earth”:
"Isaiah also cries out concerning Israel: 'Though the number
of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, The remnant will
be saved. For He will finish the work and cut it short in
righteousness, because the LORD will make a short work upon the earth.' And as Isaiah said before: 'Unless the LORD of Hosts had
left us a seed, we would have become like Sodom, and we would have been
made like Gomorrah.'" Romans 9:27-29
What Paul quotes in verses 27-28 was spoken originally of the few
Israelites that were saved from the ravage of the Assyrian army (Isaiah
10:22-23). This historical judgment - like the destruction of Sodom and
Gomorrah (v. 29; cf. Luke 17:29-30; 2 Peter 2:6) - was completely temporal (as opposed to "eternal") in
nature - and the salvation of the "remnant" of which he speaks was no
different in this regard. Paul never said a word about God's “wrath” or "indignation" being
experienced by immortal human beings in an eternal state of existence. Like God’s wrath upon Edom, it is solely confined to those sharing
in this temporal, mortal existence. Those of whom Paul wrote as being
"vessels of wrath" were his unbelieving, first-century Jewish
brethren. And the judgment for which they had been prepared was not endless
torment in an immortal state of existence, but a judgment that would be similar
in nature to the judgments that came upon the unrighteous previously in history.
But what about "predestination?" Does this word not
imply that some have a different eternal destiny than others? Not at all. To
"predestinate" simply means to "designate beforehand"; the
word doesn't tell us what a person was predestined to or for.
Whenever it is used by Paul in reference to believers, it never need be
understood to refer to our final, eternal destiny. Instead, it refers to the
destiny of certain people (i.e., members of Christ’s body) before the final
consummation (i.e., before the time when all are subjected to Christ and God
becomes “all in all”). The destiny given to believers is their being conformed
to Christ’s likeness, before anyone else (Eph. 1:4-7; Rom 8:29-30). This is a
process that begins now (2 Cor. 3:18). It is this noble destiny which God
marked out for those whom he "foreknew" - i.e., those whom God
graciously chose beforehand for a special purpose, as part of his
redemptive plan for the universe.
Unlike the rest of mankind, those who are
chosen to become members of Christ’s body are granted the faith that leads to
reconciliation with God and a deliverance from sin’s dominion in this present
life. And it is these whom God is going to be showing “the immeasurable riches
of his grace in kindness” in Christ (Eph. 2:7) – not in eternity (with
everyone else eternally excluded), but in “the ages [plural] to come.”[1] But
this in no way means that only those who are called to be believers in this
life will be finally saved, for Paul calls God "the Savior of all people, especially of
those who believe" (1 Tim 4:10). Believers – those whom God has chosen
before the foundation (or rather, “disruption”) of the world are being saved
now, and enjoy God’s grace during this life and in the ages to come. Those not
chosen by God will be saved later, when the future ages of Christ’s reign reach
their conclusion and he subjects all to himself.
The elect are essentially God’s pledge on behalf of the rest of
humanity, and as such may be understood as a prophetic sign to the rest of the
world revealing their ultimate destiny. An illustration of how God elects some
on behalf of others can be seen from the scriptural theme of
"firstfruits" and the "firstborn." Israel, as God’s elect
nation, was known as the "firstfruits" (Jer. 2:3) and
"firstborn" (Ex 3:22). But "firstfruits" serve as the
pledge of the whole harvest. To offer up firstfruits to God meant that the rest
of the harvest belonged to him as well. The New Testament uses this imagery as
well; as those who are included in Christ’s body in this age of redemptive
history, believers are known as "firstfruits" (2 Thess. 2:13; cf.
James 1:18; Rev 14:4) and possess the "firstfruits of the Spirit"
(Rom 8:22). But such language can only mean that an even greater, more
inclusive harvest is yet to come in the future. In the same way, the
"firstborn" involves and includes (in the divine economy) the whole
family. Jesus is the firstborn of not the elect only, but of all
creation (Colossians 1:15). While the firstborn and firstfruits are
few in number, they have relation to the entire creation - all who are in need
of being reconciled to their Creator.
[1] While
Christ often spoke of the “age to come” during his ministry, Paul makes it
clear that there is more than one age to come. Thus, the “age to come” is not
an endless duration of time, since it is to be followed by another age. The
“age to come” of which Christ spoke refers to the coming age of the millennial
kingdom (to which every Israelite looked forward and hoped to inherit). And
since this coming age is not eternal, we need not understand the age to follow
it to be eternal, either (and Scripture elsewhere reveals that it is not).
No comments:
Post a Comment