Monday, January 2, 2023

Who are “the chosen” of Matthew 24?

Introduction

In a recent article (click here to read it), I argued that the Jewish believers to whom the letter to the Hebrews was written did not belong to what the apostle Paul referred to as “all the ecclesias of the nations” (Romans 16:4), and thus were not members of the called-out company of believers that Paul (and Paul alone) referred to in his letters as “the body of Christ” (Rom. 12:4-5; 1 Cor. 6:15-19; 10:16-17; 12:12-27; Eph. 1:22-23; 4:4, 12-16; 5:23-24, 30; Col. 1:18, 24; 2:19; 3:15).

In this article, I’ll be making a similar case with regard to the saints whom Christ referred to as “the chosen” in Matthew 24 (and who will be on the earth during the future time of “great affliction”). I’ll be arguing that the company of saints to which the chosen will belong will be a continuation of the company of saints that was being formed during Christ’s earthly ministry (i.e., the “little flock”), and will thus be distinct from the body of Christ.

The saints of the “great affliction”

In Matthew 24:29-31 (CLNT) we read that Christ declared the following to his disciples:

“Now immediately after the affliction of those days the sun shall be darkened and the moon shall not be giving her beams, and the stars shall be falling from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken. And then shall appear the sign of the Son of Mankind in heaven, and then all the tribes of the land shall grieve, and they shall see the Son of Mankind coming on the clouds of heaven with power and much glory.

“And He shall be dispatching His messengers with a loud sounding trumpet, and they shall be assembling His chosen from the four winds, from the extremities of the heavens to their extremities.”

When Christ declared that the eon-concluding events referred to in the above passage would be occurring “immediately after the affliction of those days,” he was referring to the time of “great affliction” mentioned earlier in this prophetic discourse. After describing certain events that will be occurring before this time begins, we read the following in verses 20-22:

Now be praying that your flight may not be occurring in winter, nor yet on a sabbath,  for then shall be great affliction, such as has not occurred from the beginning of the world till now; neither under any circumstances may be occurring. And, except those days were discounted, no flesh at all would be saved. Yet, because of the chosen, those days shall be discounted.”

In my two-part refutation of the “preterist” understanding of Matthew 24 (click here for part one), I defended the view that the time period Christ had in view in these verses (i.e., the time when there “shall be great affliction”) is still future, and will be occurring at the start of the final 3 ½ years of this eon. Further confirmation of the futurity of the great affliction to which Christ was referring is found in Revelation 7:14. In this verse we’re told by a celestial messenger that a great multitude of people seen by John (Rev. 7:9-10) are “those coming out of the great affliction.” It’s evident from the immediate context that “the great affliction” referred to by the messenger is a future event, for the throng of people who we’re told will be “coming out of” this event were seen by John immediately after he was provided with information concerning a group of 144,000 Israelites who will be sealed shortly before the occurrence of the future judgments associated with the sounding of the seven trumpets (see Rev. 7:1-3; cf. Rev. 8:1-11). Since the 144,000 Israelites will be alive on the earth during the time of the calamities described later in Revelation, it’s reasonable to conclude that those comprising the great multitude described immediately after we read of the 144,000 will be alive on the earth during this future time as well. [i]

But what more can be said concerning the time of great affliction that the chosen of whom Christ spoke will be going through during this future time? One passage that I believe sheds further light on the time period that Christ had in view is Jeremiah 30:4-9. In these verses we read the following:

Now these are the words which Yahweh spoke concerning Israel and Judah:

“For this is what Yahweh says:

‘I have heard a sound of terror, of fear, and there is no peace. Ask now, and see if a male can give birth. Why do I see every man with his hands on his waist, as a woman in childbirth? And why have all faces turned pale? Woe, for that day is great, there is none like it; and it is the time of Jacob’s distress, yet he will be saved from it.

‘It shall come about on that day,’ declares Yahweh of hosts, ‘that I will break his yoke from their necks and will tear to pieces their restraints; and strangers will no longer make them their slaves. But they shall serve Yahweh their God and David their king, whom I will raise up for them.

The fact that this future time of judgment is referred to as “the time of Jacob’s distress” indicates that it most directly concerns and will involve God’s covenant people, Israel (this is further evident from the fact that, in v. 4, this prophecy is said to concern “Israel and Judah”). And just as it is Jacob/Israel who will be going through this time of distress, so it is this same people who will be saved from it (and who, after they’ve been saved, “shall serve Yahweh their God and David their king”).

Another reference to this future time of distress for the people of Israel can be found in Daniel 12:1-2:

“Now at that time Michael, the great prince who stands guard over the sons of your people, will arise. And there will be a time of distress such as never occurred since there was a nation until that time; and at that time your people, everyone who is found written in the book, will be rescued.”

Those referred to as “the sons of your [Daniel’s] people” are the people of Israel. That this future time of distress will involve a particular ethnic/national group – i.e., the people of the nation of Israel – is further evident from the words, “since there was a nation until that time.” Thus, when we’re subsequently told that everyone among Daniel’s people “who is found written in the book, will be rescued,” the people who are in view are the saints among God’s covenant people, Israel.

In light of the above considerations, it’s reasonable to conclude that “the chosen” whom Christ said will be assembled “from the four winds, from the extremities of the heavens to their extremities,” will be the saints among God’s covenant people, Israel. In light of what Christ said about the chosen being gathered “from the four winds,” it’s significant that, in Ezekiel, we read that it was “into all the winds” and “toward all winds” – i.e., all over the world – that God was going to scatter the Jewish people (Ezek. 5:10, 12; 17:21). And in Zechariah 2:6 we read that God scattered the Jews abroad “as the four winds of the heavens.” But after this scattering, we read that God will gather his “sons” and “daughters” among the scattered nation “from the end of the earth” (Isa. 43:5-7). These are referred to as his “chosen” in the same context (vv. 10, 20). Similarly, in Isaiah 11:12 we read that the “banished of Israel” and “dispersed of Judah” will be assembled “from the four corners of the earth.”

That “the chosen” referred to by Christ are Israelites is further confirmed by those verses in which Israel and the Jewish people in general are referred to as the “chosen” or “elect” (Deut. 7:6; 1 Chron. 16:13; Isaiah 45:4; Rom. 11:28), and especially those in which the believing, faithful remnant within the nation are referred to as such (Isa. 65:7-16). In the last passage referenced, we find God drawing a contrast between the unbelievers within the nation and the believing remnant (the latter of whom God refers to as “my chosen” in v. 9). God goes on to speak of how his chosen among the nation will be tremendously blessed on the earth in the future, using language that clearly refers to life during the eon to come (vv. 17-25).

Significantly, we also read in Isaiah 27:13 that the scattered children of Israel will be gathered to their homeland to “worship Yahweh on the holy mountain at Jerusalem” in conjunction with the blowing of “a great trumpet” (which is the only specific reference in the Hebrew Scriptures to a “great” trumpet). This is likely the same trumpet to which Christ was referring Matt. 24:31 (the sounding of which we’re told will result in the dispatching of Christ’s messengers to assemble the chosen from the four winds).

Now, keeping in mind the futurity of the events of which Christ was prophesying in Matthew 24, let’s now consider Christ’s use of the second-person pronouns “you” and “your” in this discourse. In Matthew 24:3-6 we read the following:

Now at His sitting on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, “Tell us, when will these things be? And what is the sign of Thy presence and of the conclusion of the eon?” And, answering, Jesus said to them, “Beware that no one should be deceiving you. For many shall be coming in My name, saying, ‘I am the Christ!’ and shall be deceiving many. Yet you shall be about to be hearing battles, and tidings of battles. See that you are not alarmed, for it must be occurring; but not as yet is the consummation.”

In verses 15-22 we read that Christ went on to prophesy concerning the time of great affliction that will begin after “the abomination of desolation” comes to be “standing in the holy place” (and which, as we read in verse 29, will end immediately before Christ’s return to earth takes place):

“Whenever, then, you may be perceiving the abomination of desolation, which is declared through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place (let him who is reading apprehend!); then let those in Judea flee into the mountains. Let him who is on the housetop not descend to take away the things out of his house. And let him who is in the field not turn back behind him to pick up his cloak.

“Now woe to those who are pregnant and those suckling in those days! Now be praying that your flight may not be occurring in winter, nor yet on a sabbath, for then shall be great affliction, such as has not occurred from the beginning of the world till now; neither under any circumstances may be occurring. And, except those days were discounted, no flesh at all would be saved. Yet, because of the chosen, those days shall be discounted.”

The use of these pronouns (which are plural) indicates that Christ considered his disciples to have been representative of the saints who will be experiencing the future events of which Christ spoke, and that the company of saints that will be alive on the earth during the time of great affliction will be a continuation of the company of saints to which Christ’s disciples belonged (and which began to be formed at the start of Christ’s earthly ministry). Concerning this company of saints, we read in Luke 12:32 that Christ declared the following: “Do not fear, little flock, for it delights your Father to give you the kingdom.”

Now, it’s commonly believed among Christians that the body of Christ is simply a continuation of “the little flock” of which we read in this verse, and that it became what it is today when the holy spirit came upon and empowered the twelve apostles on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:1-12). This would mean that, throughout the entire duration of Paul’s apostolic ministry, the body of Christ was divided up between (1) ecclesias that were comprised primarily of gentiles (i.e., the ecclesias that Paul referred to as ”all the ecclesias of the nations”) and (2) ecclesias that were comprised primarily (if not exclusively) of Jews (such as the ecclesias that Paul referred to in 1 Thess. 2:14 as the ecclesias of God in Christ Jesus that are in Judea”). I believe that this view is mistaken, however, and that there was no such ethnically-based ecclesiastical division between the saints in the body of Christ during the apostolic era.

As already noted, the company of believers that Christ referred to as the “little flock” began to be formed at the start of Christ’s earthly ministry (it was this company of saints – which began to grow rapidly after the events described in Acts 2:1-12 occurred – that came to comprise the ecclesias of God in Christ Jesus that are in Judea”). In contrast with when this company of believers began to be formed, the body of Christ did not come into existence until after the administration that Paul said was given to him for the nations – i.e., “the administration of the grace of God” (Eph. 3:1) or “administration of the secret” (v. 9) – began. It is to this administration that belongs “the evangel of which [Paul] became the dispenser” – i.e., “the evangel of the grace of God” (Acts 20:24).

But when did the administration that was given to Paul for the nations begin? Answer: it began when Paul was made “the apostle of the nations” (Rom. 11:13). And this occurred when Christ appeared to Paul on the road to Damascus and gave him his apostolic commission (Acts 9:3-6; 22:6-10). Since the little flock and the body of Christ began at two different times (with the former company of saints beginning at the start of Christ’s earthly ministry, and the latter beginning after Paul’s apostolic ministry began), it follows that these two companies of saints cannot be identical.

In addition to the fact that the little flock and the body of Christ began at two different times, another main difference between these two companies of saints concerns where the saints belonging to each called-out group of believers will be enjoying their eonian allotment. Let’s first consider the expectation of the saints who comprised the little flock.

In Matthew 5:5 we read that Christ declared the following to those who’d gathered to hear him teach (among whom were those whom Christ later referred to as the little flock): “Happy are the meek, for they shall be enjoying the allotment of the land. Similarly, Christ promised his twelve disciples that they would be judging “the twelve tribes of Israel” after he returns to earth to sit on the “throne of his glory” (Matt. 19:28). That the allotment of the little flock will be earthly in location shouldn’t be surprising, since the expectation of believing Israelites has been terrestrial with regard to the location of their eonian allotment ever since God promised to give to Abraham and his offspring “all the land of Canaan for an eonian allotment” (Gen. 17:7-10; 48:4).

Notice, also, Christ’s reference to “the kingdom” in Luke 12:32. Christ’s disciples had this same kingdom in mind when, in Acts 1:6, they asked whether the time had come for Christ to be “restoring the kingdom to Israel.” We know from what Christ declared elsewhere that the kingdom to which he and his disciples were referring on these occasions is a future reality (see, for example, Luke 21:27-31 22:14-18, 28-30). We also know that there are certain prophecies from the Hebrew Scriptures that Christ and his disciples would’ve undoubtedly had in mind when they referred to this kingdom.

For example, after being provided with a description of a great metallic image seen in a dream by Nebuchadnezzar (and which we’re later told represents four successive and preeminent kingdoms on the earth), we read the following in Dan. 2:34-35 concerning a certain stone that was ”severed from a mountain, not by hands”:

“…and [the stone] collided with the image at its feet of iron and clay and pulverized them. Then, all at once, the iron, the clay, the copper, the silver and the gold were pulverized and became as chaff from summer threshing sites; and the wind lifted them up, and not trace at all was found of them. And the stone that collided with the image became a vast mountain range and filled the whole earth….”

We’re then provided with the following explanation of this symbolic imagery in Dan. 2:44:

“In their days, that is, of these kings, the God of the heavens will set up a kingdom that for the eons shall not come to harm. His kingdom shall not be left to another people. It will pulverize and terminate all these kingdoms, and it shall be confirmed for the eons.”

We go on to read the following concerning this kingdom in Daniel 7:26-27:

“Yet adjudication sits; and they will cause his authority to pass away, even to exterminate and to destroy till the terminus. And the kingdom and the jurisdiction and the majesty of the kingdom under the entire heavens will be granted to the people of the saints of the Most High. Their kingdom is an eonian kingdom, and all other authorities shall serve and hearken to them.”

In these passages from Daniel (note, especially, the words under the entire heavens”), it’s evident that the kingdom in view – i.e., the kingdom that “the God of the heavens will set up” – will be an earthly kingdom that will succeed (and permanently replace) the gentile kingdoms that had previously ruled over the earth.[ii] That the kingdom prophesied in Daniel will be on the earth – specifically, in the land that God promised Israel – is clear from a number of other passages from the Hebrew Scriptures as well (see, for example, Jer. 3:17; 31:1-40; Isa. 2:1-4; 11:6-9; 14:3-7; 35:6-7, 32:15, 35:1; 51:3; 61:1-62; 65:17-25; Ezek. 36-38; Mic. 2:12-13; Zech. 8:22; 14:4-21; Amos 9:13). Moreover, although Christ will have dominion over the entire earth (with all other nations and kingdoms being under his authority), the geographical territory of the kingdom of God over which he will reign will be the land that God promised to Israel (the boundaries of which are specified in Gen. 15:18-20, Num. 34:1-15 and elsewhere); for a defense of this view, click here: the-judgment-of-sheep-and-goats-study.

We also know from what we read in the book of Revelation that the expectation of the saints who will be going through the great affliction will involve “reigning on the earth” as “a kingdom and priests to [Christ’s] God and Father” (Rev. 1:6; 5:10; cf. 20:4-6), and dwelling in “the citadel of the saints and the beloved city” (Rev. 20:9; for some other references to this future city – which will be the capital city of the kingdom of God on earth – see Isaiah 30:19; 33:20; 52:1-2; Jer. 3:17; 30:18-20; 33:16; Ez. 45:6-7; 48:15-35; Zech. 8:22; 14:4-21). It’s also worth noting that, in the verses referenced above, the apostle John included himself among the saints who will be “reigning on the earth” as “a kingdom and priests to [Christ’s] God and Father.” This, of course, means that John’s allotment during the eon to come will be on the earth, and that the “kingdom of God” in which he will be enjoying his allotment is the kingdom that, in accord with what we read in Acts 1:6-7, 11, Christ is going to be restoring to Israel when he returns to earth.

In contrast with the expectation of the little flock (which, again, will involve an allotment in the kingdom that’s going to be restored to Israel and established on the earth at Christ’s return), Paul revealed that the location in which the saints in the body of Christ are going to be enjoying their eonian allotment is the location where Christ is, presently – i.e., “the heavens” (2 Cor. 5:1-2; Phil. 3:20; Col. 1:5). It is in this location that we will be “at home with the Lord” after we’ve become “celestials” (2 Cor. 5:4-8; 1 Cor. 15:47-49). In accord with this fact, it is “among the celestials” that we will be enjoying “every spiritual blessing” during “the oncoming eons” (Eph. 1:3; 2:6-7), and it is “[the Lord’s] celestial kingdom” (2 Tim. 4:18) – i.e., the kingdom of God in which “flesh and blood is not able to enjoy an allotment” (1 Cor. 15:50) – for which we are being saved (2 Tim. 4:18). For a more in-depth defense of this understanding of the location of the eonian allotment of the body of Christ, click here and here.

Another difference between the little flock and the body of Christ concerns the way in which those belonging to each company of saints are (or will be) saved. We know from Paul’s letters that the eonian salvation of the body of Christ does not in any way depend on anything we must do, obey or live out. According to Paul, God’s grace was “given to us in Christ Jesus before times eonian” (2 Tim. 1:9), and “reigns” over every member of the body of Christ. The more we sin, the more God’s grace “super-exceeds” for us, resulting in life eonian (Rom. 5:20-21; 6:23). In Eph. 1:7 this grace is referred to as “the riches of [God’s] grace, which He lavishes on us,” and is such that works/acts have no part whatsoever in our salvation (Rom. 3:22; 4:4-5; 2 Tim. 1:8-11; Titus 3:3-7). According to what we read in Eph. 2:4-9, the salvation that every believer in the body of Christ will be enjoying (and which will involve God’s “displaying the transcendent riches of His grace in His kindness to us in Christ Jesus”) is “in grace” (cf. 2 Thess. 2:16), and is therefore not “out of” us. It is God’s “approach present” (or “gift”), and is thus “not of works, lest anyone should be boasting.”

Upon being given the faith to believe “the word of truth, the evangel of [our] salvation,” those called by God are then sealed with the holy spirit of promise,” which is “an earnest of the enjoyment of our allotment, to the deliverance of that which has been procured (Eph. 1:13-14). No precept-keeping obedience, acts of righteousness or Godly living is required for any member of the body of Christ to receive the “deliverance” of which Paul wrote in the above verses (and which, according to Eph. 2:4-7, will involve being vivified together and seated together “among the celestials in Christ Jesus”). This salvation is as certain to occur as anything else God has promised to do. Our having been spiritually baptized into the body of Christ (1 Cor. 12:13) and thus “sealed with the holy spirit of promise” guarantees our inclusion in the future event that will involve the saints in the body of Christ being vivified in Christ and snatched away to meet the Lord in the air (Rom. 8:15-25; 1 Cor. 15:50-57; Phil. 3:20-21; Col. 3:1-4; 1 Thess. 4:14-18; 5:9-11; 2 Thess. 2:13-14). There is, therefore, nothing that anyone in the body of Christ could do (or fail to do) that could possibly result in our not receiving this eonian salvation. Although Paul exhorted believers to “walk worthily of the calling with which [we] were called,” a failure to do so will not jeopardize our eonian salvation.

In contrast with what is the case for the saints within the body of Christ, we know that both faith and righteous, obedient conduct was required (and not merely optional) in order for the saints who belonged to the little flock to qualify for eonian life in the kingdom that’s going to be restored to Israel. In accord with the words of Habakkuk 2:4 (where we read that “the righteous shall live by his faith”), Christ undoubtedly understood faith to be essential to being righteous. However, the faith by which those comprising the little flock could be regarded as righteous (and thus “live”) was necessarily a faith that was expressed in righteous, obedient conduct (significantly, in Luke 1:5-6 – which is where the word “righteous” first occurs in Luke’s Gospel – we read that Zechariah and Elizabeth “were both righteous before God, walking blamelessly in all the commandments and statutes of the Lord; cf. Luke 2:25).

For example, Christ declared that his disciples had to possess a righteousness that was “super-abounding more than that of the scribes and Pharisees” in order to qualify for an entrance into the kingdom of God (Matt. 5:20). And it’s clear from the immediate context that this righteousness involved keeping the precepts of the law given by God to Israel (vv. 17-19). It’s further clear from what Christ declared in Matt. 23:1-3 that keeping the precepts of the law was the very thing that the scribes and Pharisees weren’t doing; as Christ made clear on other occasions, the scribes and Pharisees were guilty of leaving, breaking and repudiating “the precept of God” while keeping their own tradition in place of what God commanded (Matt. 15:1-9, Mark 7:6-9). It was because of this that Christ commanded his disciples to do and keep what the scribes and Pharisees said (i.e., when they taught from the law of Moses), but not to imitate their lawless, hypocritical acts.

Although the righteousness that made the little flock worthy of entering into life in the eon to come undoubtedly involved the heart rather than external conduct only (which is a point we find emphasized throughout Christ’s teaching), it’s also clear that righteous conduct was inseparable from being deemed worthy of entering the kingdom of God. According to Christ, it was not “workers of lawlessness” but rather those who were “doing the will of [his Father] in the heavens” who would “be entering into the kingdom of the heavens” (Matt. 7:16-23; cf. vv. 24-27). Notice that Christ contrasted doing the will of God with “lawlessness” (cf. 1 John 3:4). “Lawlessness” is, of course, the opposite of keeping God’s law/precepts.

When asked by a young man what one needed to be doing in order to have life eonian in the kingdom of God, Christ replied, “If you are wanting to be entering into life, keep the precepts (Matt. 19:16-17). In other words, keeping the precepts of the law was not an option for the believers among God’s covenant people if they wanted to “be entering into life.” It was a requirement. Christ went on to list five of the “Ten Commandments,” as well as what he considered the second of the two “greatest precepts” given to Israel: “You shall be loving your associate as yourself” (vv. 18-19; cf. Mark 12:29-34), which is from Leviticus 19:18. It was impossible for the believers who comprised the little flock to keep what Christ referred to as the “greatest precepts” while, at the same time, living in violation of the very precepts that God delivered to Israel (and which Christ instructed his disciples to keep).

This understanding is further confirmed from what we read concerning what these saints must do in order to be saved. According to Christ, the saints who will be on the earth during the time leading up to and during the great affliction must be “watching” (rather than “drowsing”) in order to qualify for an entrance into the kingdom and “stand in front of the Son of Mankind” after Christ’s return to earth (Matt. 25:1-13; Luke 12:35-40; cf. 21:34-36). Christ also declared that these saints must “endure to the consummation” in order to be saved (Matt. 10:22; 24:13; Mark 13:13; cf. Luke 21:19).

Similarly, when speaking to John concerning what he was to write to the seven ecclesias in the province of Asia (which belong to the same company of saints who will be going through the great affliction), Christ declared that it was those believers who were “faithful until death” to whom he would “be giving the wreath of life,” and that it was “the one who is conquering” who would be granted “to be eating of the tree of life which is in the center of the paradise of God,” and who would “under no circumstances be injured by the second death” (Rev. 2:7, 10-11). But what did Christ mean by being “faithful until death” here? Answer: Christ equated this with “conquering,” and it’s evident from Christ’s words in Rev. 2:26 that “conquering” involves obediently “keeping [Christ’s] acts until the consummation.” In other words, being “faithful until death” involves not just the faith but also the conduct of the saints.

In accord with the fact that only those who are “faithful unto death” will be given “the wreath of life,” Christ was also clear that the resurrection by means of which those belonging to the little flock would be able to enjoy an allotment in the kingdom of God – i.e., the resurrection that he referred to as “the resurrection of the righteous” (Luke 14:4) – is only for “those deemed worthy” (Luke 20:35-36). Moreover, it’s also clear that the righteousness of those who will be deemed worthy to have a part in the resurrection of the righteous is not a righteousness that is based on “faith alone”; rather, as is evident from Rev. 22:11, the righteousness of the saints during this time is connected with doing righteousness (instead of doing that which is wicked, such as “worshipping the wild beast or its image”; see Rev. 20:4). In accord with this fact, the saints referred to in Revelation – i.e., those who will have a part in “the former resurrection” referred to in Rev. 20:5-7 (which is the “resurrection of the righteous” to which Christ referred) – are identified as those “who are keeping the precepts of God and the faith of Jesus” (Rev. 14:12; cf. Rev. 12:17), and who refuse to worship the wild beast and its image, etc. (v. 9-10).

Consider also the following words of Christ to the ecclesia in Sardis, as recorded in Rev. 3:1-5:

I am aware of your acts, that you have a name that you are living, and are dead. Become watchful, and establish the rest who were about to be dying; for I have not found your acts completed in the sight of my God…Yet you have a few names in Sardis who have not soiled their clothes. They will walk with me, dressed in white, for they are worthy. The one who is conquering will be clothed thus in white garments, and under no circumstances will I be erasing his name from the scroll of life. I will confess his name before my Father and before his messengers.”

Notice that Christ wasn’t merely talking about receiving something in addition to being saved during the eons of his reign. He was talking about salvation itself – i.e., having eonian life during the last and greatest eon (that which pertains to the “new heaven and new earth”). Walking with Christ in white garments and not having one’s name erased from “the scroll of life” are undoubtedly about being saved rather than unsaved.

Thus, the salvation of those who will be alive on the earth when the events prophesied in Revelation are occurring (and which will include the “great affliction” referred to in Rev. 7:14) is not such that it will be received irrespective of what they do or don’t do; rather, to be worthy of entering into the kingdom that will be established on the earth at Christ’s return will require continued obedience, diligence and faithfulness (apart from which one won’t be granted to eat of the tree of life, won’t avoid the second death, etc.).

Finally, we know from Matt. 24:8 that the time of Jacob’s distress/great affliction will be preceded by what Christ referred to as “the beginning of pangs” (in fact, Christ probably had the words of Jeremiah 30:6-7 in mind when he used “birth pang” imagery to refer to the events that will precede the time great affliction). Among the first events that will constitute the beginning of pangs will be a breakout of warfare between nations and kingdoms. This warfare between nations and kingdoms will correspond to the peace-removing judgment associated with the opening of the second seal (Rev. 6:3), and will be one of the earliest expressions of God’s indignation during the coming “day of the Lord.”

In contrast with the saints who will be going through this future time of judgment, the saints in the body of Christ have not been appointed by God to indignation (1 Thess. 5:9-11; cf. 2 Thess. 2:13-14), and will thus be rescued by Christ from the coming indignation (1 Thess. 1:10). And since the event referred to by Paul in 1 Thess. 4:15-17 (i.e., the snatching away) is the means by which God will prevent the body of Christ from going through the coming indignation, this event must occur before the start of the earliest judgments that will be occurring during the day of the Lord. We can thus conclude that the body of Christ is going to be removed from the earth by Christ before the great affliction begins.

In light of the above considerations, we can conclude the following concerning “the chosen” who will be going through the great affliction: (1) they’ll be Israelites; (2) they’ll belong to the same company of saints that was being formed during Christ’s earthly ministry. In other words, they’ll be a continuation of the company of saints that Christ referred to as “the little flock” (and which predated the formation of the body of Christ). We can further conclude that the saints who comprise the body of Christ do not have the same calling and expectation as the saints who will be going through the great affliction (and who will be on the earth after the saints in the body of Christ have been snatched away).


[i] In part two of my study on Revelation 12 (Identifying the sun-clothed woman), I presented the view that the great multitude of people seen by John will consist of believing Jews who, at the time of Christ’s return, will be scattered all over the earth among the nations (and who, in contrast with the 144,000 Israelites mentioned earlier, will not be sealed). Some of the Jews of whom this great multitude will consist will already be living in whatever nation they’ll be in before the “great affliction” begins (just as there are many Jews living all over the world today). However, in accord with what we read in Luke 21:24, Joel 3:1-2 and other passages, there will be other Jews who will be among the nations at this time because of what will be occurring during the great affliction (for we read that, at this time, the Jewish people will be “led into captivity into all nations”). 

[ii] Although this kingdom is frequently referred to in Matthew’s Account as “the kingdom of the heavens” (or “the kingdom of heaven”), this particular expression is simply another way of referring to the kingdom prophesied in the above passages (which, again, is the kingdom that we’re told “the God of the heavens” shall set up). This expression does not, therefore, inform us of the location of the kingdom about which Christ taught during his earthly ministry (for this kingdom will be set up on the earth); rather, it emphasizes the heavenly source and character of this future kingdom.

4 comments:

  1. Excellent article Aaron, please keep up the great work this year. One quick question: the other day I was looking to go back and reference one of the replies you made to a previous question of mine but I think it got deleted for some reason, so if you don't mind I'd like to ask again. It regards 1 Corinthians 15 and how most scholars claim this is the earliest Christian "creed" we have, and that Paul's language indicates he got it from the other disciples, rather than the risen Christ. However, as you obviously know, this contains the description of the Evangel of the Uncircumcision, which is why I was just a bit confused as to how (or even if) one could reconcile those two viewpoints (i.e. how would it make sense if the centerpiece of the gospel that we claim is unique to Paul was given to him by the other apostles). These scholars have good intentions since they are trying to make references to the resurrection as early as possible to back up its historicity, but in my mind it creates a bit of a jam with the way we view Paul and his gospel. Again, apologies since I know you already addressed this, just want to make sure I have a concrete answer that I'll be sure to save this time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Chris!

      Sorry for the delayed response. I’m not sure what happened to the first part of my original response to your question, but I certainly don’t mind addressing this subject again (it’s an important one, after all)!

      The commonly-held view among Christian scholars that 1 Cor. 15:3 begins an early creedal statement that Paul received from the earlier apostles is, as far as I can tell, largely based on the fact that Paul referred to his evangel as having been "accepted" (or "received") by him. However, Paul's use of this word doesn't necessitate the view that the twelve apostles (or their converts) were the source of the evangel he'd accepted. I believe Paul accepted/received his evangel directly from Christ. This understanding is confirmed by what Paul wrote in Gal. 1:11-12. In v. 12, Paul used the same word that's translated "accepted" in 1 Cor. 15:3 when denying that he'd "accepted" his evangel from "a man" (and by "a man," I think it's clear from the immediate context that Paul had in mind any man other than the resurrected and ascended Christ). After denying that he'd accepted his evangel from a man or was taught it, Paul then affirmed that the evangel he received "came through a revelation of Jesus Christ." This fact is not, I don't think, consistent with the more commonly-held understanding of 1 Cor. 15:3.

      At the same time, I DO think that the information contained in 1 Cor. 15:4-7 (i.e., that Christ was roused from among the dead and then appeared to others) was, in fact, believed by the twelve apostles and those who came to believe the evangel of the Circumcision through their ministry. In fact, Paul makes it clear in 1 Cor. 15:12 that what he had in mind in v. 11 (when he used the words "whether I or they" and "we") was Christ's resurrection specifically. That is, it was THIS historical fact that was being heralded by BOTH the twelve apostles AND by Paul. Paul was, of course, already aware of the fact that the company of believers whom he had formerly persecuted believed that Christ had been roused from among the dead. And Paul undoubtedly came to believe in this historical fact as well when Christ appeared to him on the road to Damascus. But as you know, the truth of Christ's resurrection is not the ONLY element of Paul's evangel. Just as essential (but entirely absent from the evangel of the Circumcision) is the fact that "Christ died for our sins." And it is THIS essential truth that I believe is the part of Paul's evangel that WASN'T previously known or believed by the twelve apostles and their converts.

      (Continued below)

      Delete
    2. When Paul heralded his evangel to unbelievers (and declared to them that "Christ died for our sins"), I believe that the words "our sins" included all mankind (this is, I believe, evident from verses such as Rom. 3:21-23, 5:12-19, 2 Cor. 5:14 and 1 Tim. 2:6-7). This is an important point, because those who deny that there are/were two evangels will often appeal to certain verses from the Circumcision letters in which Christ's death is associated with the forgiveness of sins. However, I believe (and have argued in greater depth elsewhere on my blog) that the understanding of Christ's death found in the Circumcision letters is NOT what is being revealed in Paul's evangel. Rather than understanding Christ's death as having secured the elimination of the sins of all mankind (and thus the justification of all mankind), the twelve apostles understood Christ's death as having made it possible for those who believed their testimony (i.e., the evangel concerning Jesus' Messianic identity) to be forgiven, and to become the beneficiaries of the new covenant God is going to make with Israel. In other words, their understanding of Christ's death is that it was for the sake of everyone who will receive eonian life as a result of believing the evangel of the Circumcision (and not something that secured the ultimate salvation of every sinner without exception).

      Thus, the simple fact that "Christ died for our sins" (which implies the eventual justification and salvation of all mankind) is the key difference between the evangel of the grace of God that Paul heralded among the nations and the evangel of the Circumcision (which, being focused on Jesus' Messianic identity, includes the fact of his resurrection).

      But to what Scriptures was Paul referring when he wrote that Christ's death for our sins was "according to the Scriptures?" One possibility is that Paul was simply referring to any verse of Scripture in which Christ's death is in view, despite there being no specific mention of the fact that his death would be for the sins of all mankind. According to this view, any scriptural confirmation of the fact that Christ died can be considered as implicit confirmation of the fact that Christ died for our sins. However, I think Paul may have actually had a specific verse in view here. In Isaiah 53:11 we find it prophesied that "the many" will be justified as a result of Christ's death. Now, I don't think the original readers of Isaiah (or the Jews in Paul's day) actually understood this as a reference to all mankind. Even the first-century believers among God's covenant people probably understood "the many" of v. 11 as a reference to Israel (or to "many" within Israel). But in light of what we read in Rom. 5:18-19, I think it's quite possible that Paul understood this part of the prophecy as a "veiled reference" to all mankind. Because of the ambiguity of what's being said in this verse, however, one could still say that the distinguishing element of Paul's evangel was a secret until it was made known to him.

      Delete
    3. Thanks so much for the reply, Aaron, I made sure to screenshot this time. Like I said in my first comment, please keep up the great work this year, your articles are extremely beneficial as they are both in-depth but also understandable.

      Delete